Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodologic lessons from published systematic reviews

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Eye Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Katsimpris A, Papadopoulos I, Voulgari N, Kandarakis S, Petrou P, Karampitsakos T, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02438-7.

  2. Salehi MA, Rezagholi F, Mohammadi S, Zakavi SS, Jahanshahi A, Gouravani M, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography measurements in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02483-2.

  3. Berkowitz S, Patel S. Pilot study for neurological and retinal imaging as biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease using optical coherence tomography-angiography. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:4831.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rücker G. Meta-analysis with R: Springer; 2015.

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: André Ferreira, Rafael José Vieira.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal

    André Ferreira

  2. Unit of Anatomy, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    André Ferreira

  3. CINTESIS@RISE - Health Research Network, MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    André Ferreira, Rafael José Vieira & Bernardo Sousa-Pinto

  4. MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Rafael José Vieira & Bernardo Sousa-Pinto

Authors
  1. André Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafael José Vieira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AF and RJV conceived the idea for the letter; AF, RJV and BSP wrote and critically reviewed the letter.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Ferreira.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, A., Vieira, R.J. & Sousa-Pinto, B. Methodologic lessons from published systematic reviews. Eye 37, 3876 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02599-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02599-5

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation