Abstract
Design
A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Data sources
Electronic search included PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to March 2022 using appropriate keywords.
Selection criteria
The review included all observational studies (case–control, cohort and cross-sectional studies) published in English after 2000, comparing the prevalence of dry socket between smokers and non-smokers after simple or surgical tooth extraction. Exclusion criteria included patients with other post-extraction complications, prevalence of different risk factors, and unrelated study designs (literature reviews, case reports, expert opinion, and conference reports).
Data extraction and synthesis
Two independent investigators screened the records (by title, abstract, and full text), and selected the eligible studies according to the predefined criteria. Collected data from each study included author name and country, year of publication, gender and age of patients, smoking status, inclusion and exclusion criteria, medical history and oral hygiene, prevalence of dry socket, type of tooth and extraction technique, symptoms and treatment. Risk of bias was assessed according to the (NHLBI, NIH) Quality Assessment Tool For Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, while the level of evidence was assessed using the classification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels for diagnosis. Two independent reviewers conducted the assessments, and any disagreements were addressed through discussion.
Results
Eleven studies from ten different countries representing a total of 10,195 patients (3007 smokers and 7188 non-smokers) were included in the final analysis. Nine studies were classified as having “good” quality and two as “intermediate,” while all of the studies have the third or fourth level of evidence (through 5-graded scale). The prevalence of dry socket in smokers was about 13.2% (95% CI: 5.8–23.1%) and in non-smokers about 3.8% (95% CI: 2.1–6.0%). Meta-analysis showed that regular tobacco smoking was associated a more than 3-fold increase in the odds of dry socket after tooth extraction.
Conclusion
Despite heterogeneity among the included studies (different age groups and types of teeth extracted), there was a consistent association between cigarette smoking and an elevated risk of developing dry socket post tooth extraction.
References
Cardoso CL, Rodrigues MT, Ferreira Júnior O, Garlet GP, de Carvalho PS. Clinical concepts of dry socket. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1922–32.
Birn H. Etiology and pathogenesis of fibrinolytic alveolitis (“dry socket”). Int J Oral Surg. 1973;2:211–63.
Dai X, Gakidou E, Lopez AD. Evolution of the global smoking epidemic over the past half century: strengthening the evidence base for policy action. Tobacco Control. 2022;31:129–37.
Gourgiotis S, Aloizos S, Aravosita P, Mystakelli C, Isaia EC, Gakis C, et al. The effects of tobacco smoking on the incidence and risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications in adults. Surgeon. 2011;9:225–32.
Balaji SM. Tobacco smoking and surgical healing of oral tissues: a review. Indian J Dent Res. 2008;19:344–8.
Sweet JB, Butler DP. The relationship of smoking to localized osteitis. J Oral Surg. 1979;37:732–5.
Larsen PE. Alveolar osteitis after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Identification of the patient at risk. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;73:393–7.
Kuśnierek W, Brzezińska K, Nijakowski K, Surdacka A. Smoking as a risk factor for dry socket: a systematic review. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10:121.
Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev. 2017;6:245.
Mariani AW, Pêgo-Fernandes PM. Observational studies: why are they so important? Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132:01–2. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1321784.
Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1887–92.
Kay E. The search for common causality. Evid Based Dent. 2023;24:47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Majid, O.W. Further evidence confirms the association between smoking and dry socket: a motivational opportunity for tobacco cessation. Evid Based Dent 24, 181–183 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00938-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00938-9
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Dose- and time-dependent association of smoking and its cessation with risk of peri-implant diseases
Evidence-Based Dentistry (2024)
-
Preliminary evidence of impaired oral wound healing in e-cigarette users: a call for perioperative vaping cessation
Evidence-Based Dentistry (2024)
-
Salivary lipid changes in young adult tobacco smokers and e-cigarette users: a hidden risk to oral health?
Evidence-Based Dentistry (2024)
-
How far does feedback on oral malodor assessment influence the decision to quit smoking?
Evidence-Based Dentistry (2024)
-
Dose–response association of smoking with delayed healing of apical periodontitis after endodontic treatment
Evidence-Based Dentistry (2023)