Skip to main content
Log in

The use of latex and non-latex gloves and dental equipment in UK and Irish dental hospitals

  • Research
  • Published:
British Dental Journal Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim To identify glove usage within UK and Ireland dental hospitals as well as the use of latex- and non-latex-containing dental equipment.

Method A self-completed questionnaire was disseminated to 16 dental hospitals in the summer of 2017. The survey concerned their current use of latex and non-latex gloves and dental equipment. In addition, information was sought regarding any problems associated with non-latex and latex gloves.

Results The questionnaire response rate was 13/16 (81%), of which 100% reported the use of non-latex examination gloves. The majority were using nitrile gloves. Twelve of the 13 dental hospitals would use examination gloves for simple extractions and 11 would use sterile gloves for minor oral surgery. In ten hospitals (77%), the sterile gloves were always non-latex, and again, the majority were nitrile. Latex-containing dental equipment including orthodontic bands, prophylactic polishing cups and dental dam was still being used within some dental hospitals, but to a much lesser extent than non-latex.

Conclusion All dental hospitals were using latex-free examination gloves and were showing a move towards latex-free dental equipment. This usage is comparable to what has been seen in general dental practice and follows the trend towards latex-free dentistry.

Key points

  • Highlights the trend of latex-free gloves for aspects of clinical dentistry.

  • Describes the movement towards latex-free dental equipment and latex-free dentistry.

  • Examines the use of examination and sterile gloves for simple extraction and minor oral surgery in dental hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Critchley E, Pemberton M N. Latex and synthetic rubber glove usage in UK general dental practice: changing trends. Heliyon 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03889.

  2. Burke F J T, Wilson N H F, Christensen G J, Cheung S W, Brunton P A. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic data and practising arrangements. Br Dent J 2005; 198: 39-43.

  3. Brunton P A, Burke T, Sharif M O, Muirhead E K, Creanor S, Wilson N H F. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic details and practising arrangements in 2008. Br Dent J 2012; 212: 11-15.

  4. Burke F J T, Wilson N H F, Brunton P A, Creanor S. Contemporary dental practice in the UK. Part 1: demography and practising arrangements in 2015. Br Dent J 2019; 226: 55-61.

  5. Raggio D P, Camargo L B, Naspitz G M C C et al. Latex allergy in dentistry: clinical cases report. J Clin Exp Dent 2010; DOI: 10.4317/jced.2.e55.

  6. Clarke A. The provision of dental care for patients with natural rubber latex allergy: are patients able to obtain safe care? Br Dent J 2004; 197: 749-752.

  7. Royal College of Physicians. Latex Allergy: Occupational aspects of management 2008. 2008. Available online at https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/latex-allergy-occupational-aspects-management-2008 (accessed May 2020).

  8. Scott A, Gawkrodger D J, Yeoman C et al. Adverse reactions to protective gloves used in the dental profession: experience of the UK Adverse Reaction Reporting Project. Br Dent J 2003; 195: 686-690.

  9. Nguyen K, Kohli A. Latex Allergy. 2019. Available online at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545164/ (accessed May 2020).

  10. Mew J. Glove wearing: an assessment of the evidence. Br Dent J 2015; 218: 451-452.

  11. World Health Organisation. Evidence of hand hygiene as the building block for infection prevention and control. 2017. Available at https://www.who.int/infection-prevention/tools/core-components/evidence.pdf (accessed July 2020).

  12. Patel H B, Fleming G J P, Burke F J T. Puncture resistance and stiffness of nitrile and latex dental examination gloves. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 695-700.

  13. Cao L Y, Taylor J S, Sood A, Murray D, Siegel P D. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Synthetic Rubber Gloves. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 1001-1007.

  14. Pontén A, Hamnerius N, Bruze M et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by sterile non-latex protective gloves: clinical investigation and chemical analyses. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 68: 103-110.

  15. Reckling C, Engfeldt M, Bruze M. Occupational nitrile glove allergy caused by Pigment Blue 15. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 75: 189-190.

  16. Fuchs T. Latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994; 93: 951-952.

  17. Ownby D R. A history of latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002; 110: S27-S32.

  18. Turjanmaa K. Severe IgE mediated allergy to surgical gloves. Allergy 1984; 39: S2.

  19. Anaphylaxis Campaign. Latex Allergy: The Facts. 2019. Available at https://www.anaphylaxis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Latex-Factsheet-2019.pdf (accessed May 2020).

  20. Chiu W K, Cheung L K, Chan H C, Chow L K. A comparison of post-operative complications following wisdom tooth surgery performed with sterile or clean gloves. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35: 174-179.

  21. Brewer J D, Gonzalez A B, Baum C L et al. Comparison of Sterile vs Nonsterile Gloves in Cutaneous Surgery and Common Outpatient Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2016; 152: 1008-1014.

  22. Wang Y, Li C, Yuan H et al. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009858.pub2.

  23. Gilbert G H, Litaker M S, Pihlstrom D J, Amundson C W, Gordan V V, DPBRN Collaborative Group. Rubber dam use during routine operative dentistry procedures: findings from the Dental PBRN. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 491-499.

  24. Dental Protection. Endodontics. 2014. Available at https://www.dentalprotection.org/uk/articles/endodontics (accessed May 2020).

  25. Anaphylaxis Campaign. Dental Practice. 2019. Available at https://www.anaphylaxis.org.uk/hcp/natural-rubber-latex-nrl/dental-practice/ (accessed May 2020).

  26. Tran A M, English J D, Paige S Z, Powers J M, Bussa H I, Lee R P. Force relaxation between latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics in simulated saliva solution. Tex Dent J 2009; 126: 981-985.

  27. López N, Vicente A, Bravo L, Guirado J, Canteras M. In vitro study of force decay of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastics. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 202-207.

  28. Spina Nifida Association of Northeastern New York. Latex Allergy. Available at http://sbaneny.org/secondary-conditions/latex-allergy/#:%20~:%20text=Food%20that%20has%20been%20handled,%20chestnuts%2C%20avocados%20and%20kiwi%20fruit (accessed May 2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the time taken by colleagues in the Association of Dental Hospitals in completing and returning the questionnaires

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Critchley.

Ethics declarations

No declaration of interest.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Critchley, E., Pemberton, M. The use of latex and non-latex gloves and dental equipment in UK and Irish dental hospitals. Br Dent J (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-3330-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-3330-3

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation