Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence and management of BPH surgery-related urethral stricture: results from a large U.S. database

  • Article
  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Urethral stricture (US) is a well-known complication after surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study aimed to evaluate the contemporary incidence of the US after different types of BPH surgery, to identify associated risk factors and to assess its management.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the PearlDiver™ Mariner database, containing de-identified patient records compiled between 2011 and 2022. Specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify population characteristics and outcomes. All the most employed surgical procedures for BPH treatment were considered. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to evaluate factors associated with diagnosis of post-operative US.

Results

Among 274,808 patients who underwent BPH surgery, 10,918 developed post-operative US (3.97%) within 12 months. Higher incidence of US was observed following TURP (4.48%), Transurethral Incision of the Prostate (TUIP) (3.67%), Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP) (3.92%), HoLEP/ThuLEP (3.85%), and open Simple Prostatectomy (SP) (3.21%). Lower incidence rates were observed after laparoscopic\robot-assisted SP (1.76%), Aquablation (1.59%), Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) (1.07%), Rezum (1.05%), and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) (0.65%). Multivariable analysis showed that patients undergoing PUL, Rezum, Aquablation, PAE, and PVP were associated with a reduced likelihood of developing US compared to TURP. US required surgical treatment in 18.95% of patients, with direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) and urethroplasty performed in 14.55% and 4.50% of cases, respectively. Urethral dilatation (UD) in an outpatient setting was the primary management in most cases (76.7%).

Conclusions

The present analysis from a contemporary large dataset suggests that the incidence of US after BPH surgery is relatively low (<5%) and varies among procedures. Around 94% of US cases following BPH surgery are managed using minimally invasive treatment approaches such as UD and DVIU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Overview of urethral stricture diagnosis and treatment patterns.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The analyses conducted in this study are based on custom code developed to interface with the PearlDiver Mariner database. The code is maintained and available upon reasonable request under a nondisclosure agreement to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and database usage policies.

References

  1. Launer BM, McVary KT, Ricke WA, Lloyd GL. The rising worldwide impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2021;127:722–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dornbier R, Pahouja G, Branch J, McVary KT. The New American urological association benign prostatic hyperplasia clinical guidelines: 2019 update. Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21:32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Presicce F, De Nunzio C, Gacci M, Sosnowsky R, Lombardo R, Porpiglia F, et al. The influence of the medical treatment of LUTS on benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery: do we operate too late? Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2017;69. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02815-0.

  4. Laganà A, Di Lascio G, Di Blasi A, Licari LC, Tufano A, Flammia RS, et al. Ultrasound-guided SoracteLiteTM transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): a prospective single-center experience. World J Urol. 2023;41:1157–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Manfredi C, Arcaniolo D, Spatafora P, Crocerossa F, Fusco F, Verze P, et al. Emerging minimally invasive transurethral treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis of functional outcomes and description of complications. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04530-4.

  6. Elmansy H, Abbas L, Fathy M, Hodhod A, Shabana W, Alkandari A, et al. Top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus traditional HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): 1-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00730-x.

  7. Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate. Review of cost implementation to BPH treatment. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10:S15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Checcucci E, Veccia A, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Volpi G, Amparore D, et al. New ultra-minimally invasive surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021;33:28–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Meyer D, Weprin S, Zukovski EB, Porpiglia F, Hampton LJ, Autorino R. Rationale for robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4:643–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Autorino R, Amparore D, Loizzo D, Pandolfo SD, Checcucci E, Porpiglia F. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is better than endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8:368–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ottaiano N, Shelton T, Sanekommu G, Benson CR. Surgical complications in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment. Curr Urol Rep. 2022;23:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yagi K, Horiguchi A, Shinchi M, Ojima K, Hirano Y, Takahashi E, et al. Urethral reconstruction for iatrogenic urethral stricture after transurethral prostate surgery: an analysis of surgical and patient‐reported outcomes. Int J Urol. 2022;29:995–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lumen N, Campos-Juanatey F, Greenwell T, Martins FE, Osman NI, Riechardt S, et al. European association of urology guidelines on urethral stricture disease (Part 1): management of male urethral stricture disease. Eur Urol. 2021;80:190–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gür A, Sönmez G, Demirtaş T, Tombul ŞT, Halitgil K, Demirtaş A. Risk factors for early urethral stricture after mono-polar transurethral prostate resection: a single-center experience. Cureus. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19663.

  15. Riedinger CB, Fantus RJ, Matulewicz RS, Werntz RP, Rodriguez JF, Smith ND. The impact of surgical duration on complications after transurethral resection of the prostate: an analysis of NSQIP data. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019;22:303–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Colombo R, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol. 2006;50:563–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Hegde SS, Bansal MB. Peri‐operative complications of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: experience in the first 280 patients, and a review of literature. BJU Int. 2007;100:94–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kulkarni SB, Joglekar O, Alkandari M, Joshi PM. Management of post TURP strictures. World J Urol. 2019;37:589–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurtzman JT, Blum R, Brandes SB. Lower urinary tract stenosis following surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22:55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen ML, Correa AF, Santucci RA. Urethral strictures and stenoses caused by prostate therapy. Rev Urol. 2016;18:90–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pirola GM, Castellani D, Lim EJ, Wroclawski ML, Le Quy Nguyen D, Gubbiotti M, et al. Urethral stricture following endoscopic prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials. World J Urol. 2022;40:1391–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ivaz SL, Veeratterapillay R, Jackson MJ, Harding CK, Dorkin TJ, Andrich DE, et al. Intermittent self-dilatation for urethral stricture disease in males: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:759–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shalkamy O, Abdelazim H, Elshazly A, Soliman A, Agha M, Tagreda I, et al. Factors predicting urethral stricture recurrence after dorsal onlay augmented, buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. Urol Int. 2021;105:269–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wessells H, Morey A, Souter L, Rahimi L, Vanni A. Urethral stricture disease guideline amendment (2023). J Urol. 2023;210:64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sullivan GA, Skertich NJ, Herberg R, Madonna MB, Pillai S, Shah AN, et al. Recurrence following laparoscopic repair of bilateral inguinal hernia in children under five. Am J Surg. 2022;224:1004–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ditonno F, Franco A, Manfredi C, Sturgis M, Vourganti S, Cherullo EE, et al. Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: a population-based analysis of contemporary trends, outcomes, costs, and impact of social determinants of health. Urol Pract. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000505.

  27. Nguyen D-D, Li T, Ferreira R, Baker Berjaoui M, Nguyen A-LV, Chughtai B, et al. Ablative minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review of Aquablation, Rezum, and transperineal laser prostate ablation. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00669-z.

  28. Rukstalis D, Grier D, Stroup SP, Tutrone R, deSouza E, Freedman S, et al. Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) for obstructive median lobes: 12 month results of the MedLift study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019;22:411–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roehrborn CG, Chin PT, Woo HH. The UroLift implant: mechanism behind rapid and durable relief from prostatic obstruction. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022;25:79–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abt D, Müllhaupt G, Hechelhammer L, Markart S, Güsewell S, Schmid H-P, et al. Prostatic artery embolisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: 2-yr outcomes of a randomised, open-label, single-centre trial. Eur Urol. 2021;80:34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vince R, Hampton LJ, Vartolomei MD, Shariat SF, Porpiglia F, Autorino R. Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2018;28:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee MS, Assmus MA, Ganesh M, Han J, Helon J, Mai Q, et al. An Outcomes comparison between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, open simple prostatectomy, and robotic simple prostatectomy for large gland benign prostatic hypertrophy. Urology. 2023;173:180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xia Z, Li J, Yang X, Jing H, Niu C, Li X, et al. Robotic-assisted vs. open simple prostatectomy for large prostates: a meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.695318.

  34. Simone G, Misuraca L, Anceschi U, Minisola F, Ferriero M, Guaglianone S, et al. Urethra and ejaculation preserving robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: near-infrared fluorescence imaging-guided Madigan technique. Eur Urol. 2019;75:492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Niculescu G, Volpi G, Piramide F, et al. Urethral-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: an innovative technique to preserve ejaculatory function overcoming the limitation of the standard Millin approach. Eur Urol. 2021;80:222–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Geavlete B, Stanescu F, Moldoveanu C, Geavlete P. Continuous vs conventional bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate and standard monopolar resection: a prospective, randomised comparison of a new technological advance. BJU Int. 2014;113:288–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lichy I, Law K, Tholomier C, Nguyen D-D, Sadri I, Bouhadana D, et al. Global experience and progress in GreenLight-XPS 180-Watt photoselective vaporization of the prostate. World J Urol. 2022;40:1513–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Campobasso D, Marchioni M, De Nunzio C, Destefanis P, Fasolis G, Varvello F, et al. Predictors of re-intervention after greenlight laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate: multicenter long/mid-term follow-up experience. Mini-invasive Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.92.

  39. Tsai M-Y, Chen C-H, Chiang P-H, Chiang P-C. Combination of 180-W GreenLight XPS laser and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate for the treatment of large prostates beyond 100 ml: a novel hybrid technique. Int Urol Nephrol. 2023;55:2741–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Elsaqa M, Serag M, Leelani N, Elsawy MM, Sakr M, Abou Youssif T, et al. The incidence of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture with transurethral resection vs. holmium laser enucleation of prostate: a matched, dual-center study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022;17. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7967.

  41. Cornu J-N, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol. 2015;67:1066–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nicholson HL, Al-Hakeem Y, Maldonado JJ, Tse V. Management of bladder neck stenosis and urethral stricture and stenosis following treatment for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S92–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cindolo L, Marchioni M, Emiliani E, De Francesco P, Primiceri G, Castellan P, et al. Bladder neck contracture after surgery for benign prostatic obstruction. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2017;69. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02777-6.

  44. Kaplan S, Kaufman RP, Mueller T, Elterman D, Chughtai B, Rukstalis D, et al. Retreatment rates and postprocedural complications are higher than expected after BPH surgeries: a US healthcare claims and utilization study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00741-8.

  45. Isali I, Wong TR, Wu C-HW, Scarberry K, Gupta S, Erickson BA, et al. Genomic risk factors for urethral stricture: a systematic review and gene network analysis. Urology. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.12.014.

  46. Güler Y. Urethral injury treatment challenge. comparison of surgical treatments for acquired or iatrogenic urethral stenosis and predictive values for failure of each surgical method. Folia Med. 2021;63:42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Meeks JJ, Erickson BA, Granieri MA, Gonzalez CM. Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review. J Urol. 2009;182:1266–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Osterberg EC, Murphy G, Harris CR, Breyer BN. Cost-effective strategies for the management and treatment of urethral stricture disease. Urol Clin N Am. 2017;44:11–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Helmy TE, Sarhan O, Hafez AT, Dawaba M, Ghoneim MA. Perineal anastomotic urethroplasty in a pediatric cohort with posterior urethral strictures: critical analysis of outcomes in a contemporary series. Urology. 2014;83:1145–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: LCL, EB. Acquisition of data: CM, AF, FD. Analysis and interpretation of data: LCL, EB, CM. Statistical analysis: LCL, EB, FD. Drafting of manuscript: LCL, AF, RA, CL, LC, GS. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: CDN, AA, EEC, EOO, MDS, RA.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Autorino.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Licari, L.C., Bologna, E., Manfredi, C. et al. Incidence and management of BPH surgery-related urethral stricture: results from a large U.S. database. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00841-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00841-z

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation