Skip to main content
Log in

Revolution in the Polycomb hierarchy

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Traditionally, maintenance of gene silencing by the Polycomb group proteins has been thought to involve recruitment of Polycomb repressive complex (PRC) 1 by PRC2-mediated trimethylation of K27 on histone H3. Three recent studies challenge this model by demonstrating that monoubiquitination of histone H2A, which is catalyzed by PRC1 complexes, can recruit PRC2 and potentiate its catalytic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Hierarchical models for recruitment of Polycomb group complexes to target genes.
Figure 2: Mechanisms underlying recruitment of Polycomb group proteins to target genes.

References

  1. Simon, J.A. & Kingston, R.E. Mol. Cell 49, 808–824 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackledge, N.P et al. Cell 157, 1445–1459 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, S. et al. Cell Rep. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.012 (22 May 2014).

  4. Kalb, R. et al. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 569–571 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauvageau, M. & Sauvageau, G. Cell Stem Cell 7, 299–313 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Helin, K. & Dhanak, D. Nature 502, 480–488 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Farcas, A.M et al. eLife 1, e00205 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, X., Johansen, J.V. & Helin, K. Mol. Cell 49, 1134–1146 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Margueron, R. & Reinberg, D. Nature 469, 343–349 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Morey, L. et al. Cell Stem Cell 10, 47–62 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuettengruber, B. et al. PLoS Biol. 7, e13 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, L. et al. Mol. Cell 14, 637–646 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao, R. et al. Science 298, 1039–1043 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischle, W. et al. Genes Dev. 17, 1870–1881 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Min, J., Zhang, Y. & Xu, R.-M. Genes Dev. 17, 1823–1828 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao, Z. et al. Mol. Cell 45, 344–356 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tavares, L. et al. Cell 148, 664–678 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, M. et al. Mol. Cell 45, 330–343 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Endoh, M. et al. Development 135, 1513–1524 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gutiérrez, L. et al. Development 139, 117–127 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristian Helin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

I.C. declares no competing financial interests. K.H. is a cofounder of EpiTherapeutics Aps, is a member of the EpiTherapeutics board of directors and has shares and warrants in the company.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Comet, I., Helin, K. Revolution in the Polycomb hierarchy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21, 573–575 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2848

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2848

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation