Skip to main content
Log in

Decade in review—imaging

A decade in image-guided prostate biopsy

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Urology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

The prostate is still largely assessed by random biopsy, but developments in prostate MRI and fusion with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) have made targeted biopsy of the prostate a reality. MRI/TRUS techniques promise to address the issues of overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hoeks, C. M. et al. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur. Urol. 62, 902–909 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roethke, M. et al. MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy. World J. Urol. 30, 213–218 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haffner, J. et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection. BJU Int. 108, E171–E178 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinto, P. A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J. Urol. 186, 1281–1285 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rastinehad, A. R. et al. Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy. J. Urol. 191, 1749–1754 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wysock, J. S. et al. A Prospective, Blinded Comparison of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion and Visual Estimation in the Performance of MR-targeted Prostate Biopsy: The PROFUS Trial. Eur. Urol. 66, 343–351 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sonn, G. A. et al. Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur. Urol. 65, 809–815 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rud, E., Baco, E. & Eggesbø, H. B. MRI and ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy using soft image fusion. Anticancer Res. 32, 3383–3389 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Delongchamps, N. B. et al. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. J. Urol. 189, 493–499 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuru, T. H. et al. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. J. Urol. 190, 1380–1386 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter L. Choyke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turkbey, B., Choyke, P. A decade in image-guided prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Urol 11, 611–612 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.273

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.273

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation