Skip to main content
Log in

Connective tissue diseases

Refining the classification criteria for primary Sjögren syndrome

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Rheumatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

The 2016 ACR–EULAR classification criteria for primary Sjögren syndrome, which are intended to facilitate uniform classification of patients for enrolment in clinical studies, combine features of previous criteria sets. These new criteria are a step in the right direction, but further refinement would increase their utility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Vitali, C. et al. Classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 61, 554–558 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiboski, S. C. et al. American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a data-driven, expert consensus approach in the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance cohort. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken). 64, 475–487 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vitali, C. et al. Classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: we actually need to definitively resolve the long debate on the issue. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 476–478 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shiboski, C. H. et al. 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome: a consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Ann. Rheum. Dis. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210571 (2016).

  5. Bron, A. J., Evans, V. E. & Smith, J. A. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 22, 640–650 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jousse-Joulin, S. et al. Is salivary gland ultrasonography a useful tool in Sjögren's syndrome? A systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 55, 789–800 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baer, A. N. et al. The SSB-positive/SSA-negative antibody profile is not associated with key phenotypic features of Sjögren's syndrome. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 74, 1557–1561 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, B. et al. Standardisation of labial salivary gland histopathology in clinical trials in primary Sjögren's syndrome. Ann. Rheum. Dis. (in press) (2016).

  9. Pijpe, J. et al. Parotid gland biopsy compared with labial biopsy in the diagnosis of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46, 335–341 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Delli, K. et al. Towards personalised treatment in primary Sjögren's syndrome: baseline parotid histopathology predicts responsiveness to rituximab treatment. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 75, 1933–1938 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank F.G.M. Kroese (immunologist) and N. Sillevis Smit–Kamminga (ophthalmologist) for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrika Bootsma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.V. and H.B. declare that they were members of the International Sjögren's Syndrome Criteria Working Group that developed the 2016 ACR–EULAR classification criteria; they were among the clinician-experts who scored the clinical vignettes.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vissink, A., Bootsma, H. Refining the classification criteria for primary Sjögren syndrome. Nat Rev Rheumatol 13, 10–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2016.208

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2016.208

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation