Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spondyloarthropathies

EULAR recommendations reflect advances in imaging

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Rheumatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Substantial advances have been made in the field of imaging in spondyloarthritis, with respect to both the techniques themselves and their applications, but how should clinicians and radiologists make the most of these developments? New recommendations from EULAR could provide valuable guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Mandl, P. et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice. Ann. Rheum. Dis. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206971.

  2. van der Linden, S., Valkenburg, H. A. & Cats, A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 27, 361–368 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reveille, J. D. & Weisman, M. H. The epidemiology of back pain, axial spondyloarthritis and HLA-B27 in the United States. Am. J. Med. Sci. 345, 431–436 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudwaleit, M., Khan, M. A. & Sieper, J. The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria? Arthritis Rheum. 52, 1000–1008 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rudwaleit, M. et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 70, 25–31 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Salaffi, F. et al. Radiological scoring methods for ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison between the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index and the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 25, 67–74 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Gaalen, F. A., Bakker, P. A., de Hooge, M., Schoones, J. W. & van der Heijde, D. Assessment of sacroiliitis by radiographs and MRI: where are we now? Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 26, 384–388 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weber, U. et al. Diagnostic utility of candidate definitions for demonstrating axial spondyloarthritis on magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67, 924–933 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aydin, S. Z. et al. Comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of clinically defined knee enthesitis in spondyloarthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 31, 933–936 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Whiting, P. F. et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 155, 529–536 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Reveille.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice. (DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reveille, J. EULAR recommendations reflect advances in imaging. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11, 388–389 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.80

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.80

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation