Skip to main content
Log in

Vasculitis syndromes

Vasculitis assessments—what do patients think?

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Rheumatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Takayasu arteritis is an understudied disease but a recent article emphasizes the heavy burden it imposes on patients. New assessments devised to improve disease understanding are based on physicians' concepts of disease severity. However, wide differences exist between patient and physician priorities and more work is now needed to improve patient quality-of-life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Arch aortogram in a patient with Takayasu arteritis.

References

  1. Yilmaz, N. et al. Impaired quality of life, disability and mental health in Takayasu's arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket238.

  2. Mukhtya, C. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 68, 318–323 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Misra, R. N. et al. Development and initial validation of the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010). Rheumatology (Oxford) http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket128.

  4. Sinha, D., Mondal, S., Nag, A. & Ghosh, A. Development of colour Doppler ultrasound scoring system in patients of Takayasu's arteritis and its correlation with clinical activity score (ITAS 2010). Rheumatology (Oxford) http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket289.

  5. Merkel, P. A. et al. The OMERACT core set of outcome measures for use in clinical trials of ANCA-associated vasculitis. J. Rheumatol. 38, 1480–1486 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh, M et al. Health related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis. Arthritis Care Res. 63, 1055–1061 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paterson, C. Measuring outcome in primary care: a patient-generated measure, MYMOP, compared to the SF-36 health survey. BMJ 312, 1016–1020 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Herlyn, K. et al. Patient-reported outcome assessment in vasculitis may provide important data and a unique perspective. Arthritis Care Res. 62, 1639–1645 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanderson, T. et al. The impact triad (severity, importance and self-management) as a method of enhancing the measurement of the personal life impact of rheumatic diseases (Editorial). J. Rheumatol. 38, 191–194 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Williamson, P. R. et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 13, 132–140 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank S. Hewlett for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Bacon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bacon, P., Sanderson, T. Vasculitis assessments—what do patients think?. Nat Rev Rheumatol 9, 641–642 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2013.150

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2013.150

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation