Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Migraine

Are migraine endophenotypes needed?

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Neurology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Classification of migraine into different endophenotypes could aid diagnosis and treatment, but requires detailed characterization of different phenotypes. A new study provides insight into the clinical features of migraine with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms, but raises questions about the value of such classifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Barbanti, P. et al. The phenotype of migraine with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms documents increased peripheral and central trigeminal sensitization. A case series of 757 patients. Cephalalgia http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102416630579 (2015).

  2. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 33, 629–808 (2013).

  3. Anttila, V. et al. Genome-wide association study of migraine implicates a common susceptibility variant on 8q22.1. Nat. Genet. 42, 869–873 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anttila, V. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new susceptibility loci for migraine. Nat. Genet. 45, 912–917 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gormley, P. et al. Meta-analysis of 375,000 individuals identifies 38 susceptibility loci for migraine [abstract]. bioRχiv [online], (2015).

  6. Amin, F. M. et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial and extracranial arteries in patients with spontaneous migraine without aura: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. 12, 454–461 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Asghar, M. S. et al. Evidence for a vascular factor in migraine. Ann. Neurol. 69, 635–645 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is supported by a grant from the Candys Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jes Olesen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Jes Olesen has received research support from and/or has consulted for and/or has been on the speakers' bureau of Alder Biopharmaceuticals and Curatis Pharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olesen, J. Are migraine endophenotypes needed?. Nat Rev Neurol 12, 320–321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.31

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.31

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation