Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transplantation

BENEFIT of belatacept: kidney transplantation moves forward

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Nephrology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

New data from the BENEFIT study demonstrate that belatacept improves long-term allograft and patient survival after kidney transplantation, despite higher rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection than with ciclosporin. The noninferiority design of BENEFIT represents a feasible strategy to further the development of innovator drugs to reduce late graft loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Vincenti, F. et al. Belatacept and long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 333–343 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamb, K. E., Lodhi, S. & Meier-Kriesche, H. U. Long-term renal allograft survival in the United States: a critical reappraisal. Am. J. Transplant. 11, 450–462 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vincenti, F. et al. A phase III study of belatacept-based immunosuppression regimens versus cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients (BENEFIT study). Am. J. Transplant. 10, 535–546 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Durrbach, A. et al. A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in kidney transplants from extended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT study). Am. J. Transplant. 10, 547–557 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Halloran, P. F., Reeve, J. P., Pereira, A. B., Hidalgo, L. G. & Famulski, K. S. Antibody-mediated rejection, T cell-mediated rejection, and the injury-repair response: new insights from the Genome Canada studies of kidney transplant biopsies. Kidney Int. 85, 258–264 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rostaing, L. et al. Long-term belatacept exposure maintains efficacy and safety at 5 years: results from the long-term extension of the BENEFIT study. Am. J. Transplant. 13, 2875–2883 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jardine, A. G., Gaston, R. S., Fellstrom, B. C. & Holdaas, H. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in adult recipients of kidney transplants. Lancet 378, 1419–1427 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Archdeacon, P., Dixon, C., Belen, O., Albrecht, R. & Meyer, J. Summary of the US FDA approval of belatacept. Am. J. Transplant. 12, 554–562 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schold, J. D. & Kaplan, B. The elephant in the room: failings of current clinical endpoints in kidney transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 10, 1163–1166 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Piaggio, G. et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 308, 2594–2604 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten Naesens.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naesens, M., Thaunat, O. BENEFIT of belatacept: kidney transplantation moves forward. Nat Rev Nephrol 12, 261–262 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.34

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.34

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation