Skip to main content
Log in

Pancreas

Reconstruction methods after pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy are both used for reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy; which method is best is still debated. A nationwide multicentre randomized clinical trial that compared these two types of reconstruction has demonstrated that pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with a substantially lower rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Fernández-Cruz, L. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 18, 762–768 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeo, C. J. et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 222, 580–588 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassi, C. et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann. Surg. 242, 767–771 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Duffas, J. P. et al. A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am. J. Surg. 189, 720–729 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández-Cruz, L., Cosa, R., Blanco, L., López-Boado, M. A. & Astudillo, E. Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann. Surg. 248, 930–938 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Topal, B. et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 14, 655–662 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bassi, C. et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138, 8–13 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dindo, D., Demartines, N. & Clavien, P. A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 240, 205–213 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt, C. M. et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A single-institution experience. Arch. Surg. 145, 634–640 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pessaux, P. et al. Permeability and functionality of pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy with dynamic magnetic resonance pancreatography after secretin stimulation. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 194, 454–462 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Bassi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malleo, G., Bassi, C. Reconstruction methods after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10, 445–446 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.114

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.114

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation