Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiple myeloma and chronic leukaemias in 2014

Improved understanding of disease biology and treatment

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

In 2014, strides were made in the care of haematological malignancies. In particular, the heterogeneity of multiple myeloma was unravelled, and new diagnostic criteria and frontline standards of care were proposed; new therapeutic approaches have been validated and approved in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; and in chronic myeloid leukaemia, complete cytogenetic response was confirmed as the primary therapeutic end point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lohr, J. G. et al. Widespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapy. Cancer Cell 25, 91–101 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mateos, M. V. et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 438–447 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajkumar, S. V. et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 156, e538–e548 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benboubker, L. et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 906–917 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Byrd, J. C. et al. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 213–223 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Furman, R. R. et al. Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 997–1007 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goede, V. et al. Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1101–1110 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hehlmann, R. et al. Deep molecular response is reached by the majority of patients treated with imatinib, predicts survival, and is achieved more quickly by optimized high-dose imatinib: results from the randomized CML-study IV. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 415–422 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Branford, S. et al. Prognosis for patients with CML and >10% BCR–ABL1 after 3 months of imatinib depends on the rate of BCR–ABL1 decline. Blood 124, 511–518 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Branford, S. et al. Any BCRABL reduction below 10% at 6 months of therapy significantly improves outcome for CML patients with a poor response at 3 months [abstract]. Blood 122, a254 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús F. San-Miguel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.F.S.-M. has acted in a consultancy or advisory capacity for Bristol–Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Millennium, MSD, Novartis and Onyx. H.M.K. has received research grants from Amgen, ARIAD, Bristol–Myers Squibb, Novartis and Pfizer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

San-Miguel, J., Kantarjian, H. Improved understanding of disease biology and treatment. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12, 71–72 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.216

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.216

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation