Skip to main content
Log in

Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis

  • Protocol
  • Published:

From Nature Protocols

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D DIGE) is a modified form of 2D electrophoresis (2DE) that allows one to compare two or three protein samples simultaneously on the same gel. The proteins in each sample are covalently tagged with different color fluorescent dyes that are designed to have no effect on the relative migration of proteins during electrophoresis. Proteins that are common to the samples appear as 'spots' with a fixed ratio of fluorescent signals, whereas proteins that differ between the samples have different fluorescence ratios. With the appropriate imaging system, DIGE is capable of reliably detecting as little as 0.5 fmol of protein, and protein differences down to ± 15%, over a >10,000-fold protein concentration range. DIGE combined with digital image analysis therefore greatly improves the statistical assessment of proteome variation. Here we describe a protocol for conducting DIGE experiments, which takes 2–3 d to complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Schematic of DIGE analysis.
Figure 2: Chemical structure of DIGE dyes.
Figure 3: Fluorescence gel imager/spot picker.
Figure 4: DIGE images.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O'Farrell, P.H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250, 4007–4021 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scheele, G.A. Two-dimensional gel analysis of soluble proteins. Characterization of guinea pig exocrine pancreatic proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250, 5375–5385 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klose, J. Protein mapping by combined isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis of mouse tissues. A novel approach to testing for induced point mutations in mammals. Humangenetik 26, 231–243 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gorg, A., Postel, W. & Gunther, S. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 9, 531–546 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamdan, M. & Righetti, P.G. Proteomics Today: Protein Assessment and Biomarkers using Mass Spectrometry, 2D Electrophoresis, and Microarray Technology (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Unlu, M., Morgan, M.E. & Minden, J.S. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 18, 2071–2077 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lilley, K. in Current Protocols in Protein Science (eds. Coligan, J.E., Dunn, B.M., Speicher, D.W. & Wingfield, P.T.) 22.2.1–22.2.14 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Gong, L. et al. Drosophila ventral furrow morphogenesis: a proteomic analysis. Development 131, 643–656 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaw, M.M. & Riederer, B.M. Sample preparation for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 3, 1408–1417 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marouga, R., David, S. & Hawkins, E. The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 382, 669–678 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Okano, T. et al. Plasma proteomics of lung cancer by a linkage of multi-dimensional liquid chromatography and two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 6, 3938–3948 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, H. et al. Intact-protein-based high-resolution three-dimensional quantitative analysis system for proteome profiling of biological fluids. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 618–625 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kondo, T. et al. Application of sensitive fluorescent dyes in linkage of laser microdissection and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis as a cancer proteomic study tool. Proteomics 3, 1758–1766 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sitek, B. et al. Novel approaches to analyse glomerular proteins from smallest scale murine and human samples using DIGE saturation labelling. Proteomics 6, 4506–4513 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, G. et al. 2D differential in-gel electrophoresis for the identification of esophageal scans cell cancer-specific protein markers. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1, 117–124 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karp, N.A. & Lilley, K.S. Maximising sensitivity for detecting changes in protein expression: experimental design using minimal CyDyes. Proteomics 5, 3105–3115 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tonge, R. et al. Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology. Proteomics 1, 377–396 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, J.X. et al. Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry based proteomic analysis of Escherichia coli . Proteomics 2, 1682–1698 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. SExtractor: software for source extraction. Astron. Astrophys. 117, 393–404 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Suehara, Y. et al. Proteomic signatures corresponding to histological classification and grading of soft-tissue sarcomas. Proteomics 6, 4402–4409 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw, J. et al. Evaluation of saturation labelling two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis fluorescent dyes. Proteomics 3, 1181–1195 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou, S., Bailey, M.J., Dunn, M.J., Preedy, V.R. & Emery, P.W. A quantitative investigation into the losses of proteins at different stages of a two-dimensional gel electrophoresis procedure. Proteomics 5, 2739–2747 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan S Minden.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

JM has a conflict of interest with respect to DIGE and the ProteoHook protein clean up kit. These methods were developed in the Minden lab and licensed to Amersham and Proteopure, respectively. JM receives royalties for DIGE from Amersham and options from Proteopure. SV is an employee of Proteopure.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video 1

DIGE movie. Shown here is a two-frame, looping movie comparing different mouse cell extracts. (MOV 195 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viswanathan, S., Ünlü, M. & Minden, J. Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Nat Protoc 1, 1351–1358 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.234

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.234

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation