Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological restoration: Soil microbes call the shots

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Plants

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Restoration of damaged ecosystems usually involves fairly crude techniques. A new study suggests that the use of soil inocula can ‘design’ new target communities more subtly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Effects of soil inoculation on plant and soil communities in the field after topsoil removal.

References

  1. Wubs, E. R. J. et al. Nature Plants 2, 16107 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris, J. Science 325, 573–574 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradshaw, A. D. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 286, 557–561 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daft, M. J. & Hacskaylo, E. J. Appl. Ecol. 13, 523–531 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ingleby, K. et al. Forest Ecol. Manage. 12, 279–285 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marrs, R. H. et al. J. Appl. Ecol. 17, 803–813. (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Batary, P. et al. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1006–1016 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell, R. J. et al. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 3, 142–160 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Silvertown, J. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 556–561 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert H. Marrs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marrs, R. Ecological restoration: Soil microbes call the shots. Nature Plants 2, 16117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.117

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.117

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation