Skip to main content
Log in

Nematicity and quantum paramagnetism in FeSe

  • Article
  • Published:

From Nature Physics

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

In common with other iron-based high-temperature superconductors, FeSe exhibits a transition to a ‘nematic’ phase below 90 K in which the crystal rotation symmetry is spontaneously broken. However, the absence of strong low-frequency magnetic fluctuations near or above the transition has been interpreted as implying the primacy of orbital ordering. In contrast, we establish that quantum fluctuations of spin-1 local moments with strongly frustrated exchange interactions can lead to a nematic quantum paramagnetic phase consistent with the observations in FeSe. We show that this phase is a fundamental expression of the existence of a Berry’s phase associated with the topological defects of a Néel antiferromagnet, in a manner analogous to that which gives rise to valence bond crystal order for spin-1/2 systems. We present an exactly solvable model realizing the nematic quantum paramagnetic phase, discuss its relation with the spin-1 J1J2 model, and construct a field theory of the Landau-forbidden transition between the Néel state and this nematic quantum paramagnet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: The stripe AF and the interactions in HK.
Figure 2: The monopole phase factors.
Figure 3: Schematic phase diagrams.
Figure 4: The nematic paramagnetic ground states of HK from equation (2).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, P. W. The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity. Science 235, 1196–1198 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Figueirido, F. et al. Exact diagonalization of finite frustrated spin-1/2 Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. B 41, 4619–4632 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang, H.-C., Yao, H. & Balents, L. Spin liquid ground state of the spin-1/2 square J1–J2 Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. B 86, 024424 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gong, S.-S., Zhu, W., Sheng, D. N., Motrunich, O. I. & Fisher, M. P. A. Plaquette ordered phase and quantum phase diagram in the spin-1/2J1–J2 square Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 027201 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haldane, F. D. M. O(3) nonlinear σ model and the topological distinction between integer- and half-integer-spin antiferromagnets in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1029–1032 (1988).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Read, N. & Sachdev, S. Valence-bond and spin-Peierls ground states of low-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1694–1697 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Qazilbash, M. M. et al. Electronic correlations in the iron pnictides. Nature Phys. 5, 674–650 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Si, Q., Abrahams, E., Dai, J. & Zhu, J.-X. Correlation effects in the iron pnictides. New J. Phys. 11, 045001 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin, Z. P., Haule, K. & Kotliar, G. Kinetic frustration and the nature of the magnetic and paramagnetic states in iron pnictides and iron chalcogenides. Nature Mater. 10, 932–935 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gretarsson, H. et al. Revealing the dual nature of magnetism in iron pnictides and iron chalcogenides using x-ray emission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 84, 100509 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maletz, J. et al. Unusual band renormalization in the simplest iron-based superconductor FeSe1−x . Phys. Rev. B 89, 220506 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakayama, K. et al. Reconstruction of band structure induced by electronic nematicity in an FeSe superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 237001 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watson, M. D. et al. Emergence of the nematic electronic state in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 91, 155106 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, P. et al. Observation of two distinct d xz/d yz band splittings in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 91, 214503 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chu, J.-H., Kuo, H.-H., Analytis, J. G. & Fisher, I. R. Divergent nematic susceptibility in an iron arsenide superconductor. Science 337, 710–712 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chandra, P., Coleman, P. & Larkin, A. Ising transition in frustrated Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 88–91 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fang, C., Yao, H., Tsai, W.-F., Hu, J. & Kivelson, S. A. Theory of electron nematic order in LaFeAsO. Phys. Rev. B 77, 224509 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, C., Müller, M. & Sachdev, S. Ising and spin orders in the iron-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 78, 020501 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baek, S.-H. et al. Orbital-driven nematicity in FeSe. Nature Mater. 14, 210–214 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Böhmer, A. E. et al. Origin of the tetragonal-to-orthorhombic (nematic) phase transition in FeSe: A combined thermodynamic and NMR study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 027001 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Affleck, I., Kennedy, T., Lieb, E. H. & Tasaki, H. Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 799–802 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arovas, D. P., Auerbach, A. & Haldane, F. D. M. Extended Heisenberg models of antiferromagnetism: Analogies to the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 531–534 (1988).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Peschel, I. & Emery, V. Calculation of spin correlations in two-dimensional Ising systems from one-dimensional kinetic models. Z. Phys. B 43, 241–249 (1981).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang, H. C. et al. Phase diagram of the frustrated spatially-anisotropic s = 1 antiferromagnet on a square lattice. Phys. Rev. B 79, 174409 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Senthil, T., Vishwanath, A., Balents, L., Sachdev, S. & Fisher, M. P. A. Deconfined quantum critical points. Science 303, 1490–1494 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abanov, A. & Wiegmann, P. Theta-terms in nonlinear sigma-models. Nucl. Phys. B 570, 685–698 (2000).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, C. & Ludwig, A. W. W. Nonperturbative effects of a topological theta term on principal chiral nonlinear sigma models in 2 + 1 dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200405 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nie, L., Tarjus, G. & Kivelson, S. A. Quenched disorder and vestigial nematicity in the pseudogap regime of the cuprates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7980–7985 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kasahara, S. et al. Field-induced superconducting phase of FeSe in the BCS-BEC cross-over. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16309–16313 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Terashima, T. et al. Anomalous Fermi surface in FeSe seen by Shubnikov–de Haas oscillation measurements. Phys. Rev. B 90, 144517 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Q. et al. Strong interplay between stripe spin fluctuations, nematicity and superconductivity in FeSe. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/pdf/1502.07544 (2015)

  32. Glarum, S. H., Geschwind, S., Lee, K. M., Kaplan, M. L. & Michel, J. Observation of fractional spin S = 1/2 on open ends of S = 1 linear antiferromagnetic chains: Nonmagnetic doping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1614–1617 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Glasbrenner, J. K., Mazin, I. I., Jeschke, H. O., Hirschfeld, P. J. & Valent, R. Effect of magnetic frustration on nematicity and superconductivity in Fe chalcogenides. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3434 (2015)

  34. Rong, Y. & Si, Q. Antiferroquadrupolar and Ising-nematic orders of a frustrated bilinear-biquadratic Heisenberg model and implications for the magnetism of FeSe. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/pdf/1501.05926 (2015)

  35. Chubukov, A. V., Fernandes, R. M. & Schmalian, J. Origin of nematic order in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 91, 201105 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Jiang and T. Xiang for useful discussions. F.W. was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2014CB920902) and the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11374018). S.A.K. was supported in part by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, grant DE-AC02-76SF00515 at Stanford. D.-H.L. was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, grant DE-AC02-05CH11231. D.-H.L. and S.A.K. would like to thank KITP for hospitality, supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF PHY11-25915, where the collaboration started.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contribute equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dung-Hai Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (PDF 887 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Kivelson, S. & Lee, DH. Nematicity and quantum paramagnetism in FeSe. Nature Phys 11, 959–963 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3456

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3456

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation