Skip to main content
Log in

The promises and challenges of solid-state sequencing

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Nanotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Sequencing methods based on electron tunnelling could lead to breakthroughs in genomics, proteomics and glycomics, but the engineering challenges involved in delivering these devices are formidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Three physical approaches to sequencing a moving DNA molecule.

References

  1. Church, G., Deamer, D. W., Branton, D., Baldarelli, R. & Kasianowicz, J. Characterization of individual polymer molecules based on monomer-interface interactions. US patent 5,795,782 (1998).

  2. Manrao, E. A. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 30, 349–353 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ip, C. L. C. et al. F1000Research 4, 1075 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heerema, S. J. & Dekker, C. Nature Nanotech. 11, 127–136 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Ventra, M. & Taniguchi, M. Nature Nanotech. 11, 117–126 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, J. E. J. Gen. Physiol. 66, 531–532 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akahori, R. et al. Nanotechnology 25, 275501 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laszlo, A. H. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 32, 829–833 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, M. et al. Nature Methods 12, 351–356 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garaj, S. et al. Nature 467, 190–193 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zwolak, M. & Di Ventra, M. Nano Lett. 5, 421–424 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui, X. D. et al. Science 294, 571–574 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang, S. et al. Nanotechnology 23, 235101–235115 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang, S., He, J., Zhang, P., Gyarfas, B. & Lindsay, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 14267–14269 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pang, P. et al. ACS Nano 8, 11994–12003 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai, J. et al. Nanoscale 6, 8900–8906 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cherf, G. M. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 30, 344–348 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fologea, D. et al. Nano Lett. 5, 1905–1909 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Briggs, K. et al. Nanotechnology 26, 084004 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krishnakumar, P. et al. ACS Nano 7, 10319–10326 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Human Genome Research Institute (grant HG 006323), F. Hoffman La Roche and Recognition AnalytiX. Useful discussions with P. Pang, P. Zhang, B. Ashcroft and W. Song are acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Lindsay.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author is a co-founder of Recognition AnalytiX, a company that holds the rights to applications of recognition tunnelling technology in the fields of proteomics and glycomics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindsay, S. The promises and challenges of solid-state sequencing. Nature Nanotech 11, 109–111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.9

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation