Skip to main content
Log in

Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Trial-to-trial variability in the blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) response of functional magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to be relevant to human perception and behavior, but the sources of this variability remain unknown. We demonstrate that coherent spontaneous fluctuations in human brain activity account for a significant fraction of the variability in measured event-related BOLD responses and that spontaneous and task-related activity are linearly superimposed in the human brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Identification of regions of interest in the LMC and RMC for a single subject (subject 1).
Figure 2: Coherent spontaneous fluctuations account for a significant fraction of the variance in measured event-related responses.
Figure 3: Coherent spontaneous fluctuations and task-related responses are linearly superimposed.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ress, D. & Heeger, D.J. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 414–420 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pessoa, L. & Padmala, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5612–5617 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagner, A.D. et al. Science 281, 1188–1191 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pessoa, L., Gutierrez, E., Bandettini, P.A. & Ungerleider, L.G. Neuron 35, 975–987 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arieli, A., Sterkin, A., Grinvald, A. & Aertsent, A. Science 273, 1868–1871 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiser, J., Chiu, C. & Weliky, M. Nature 431, 573–578 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Azouz, R. & Gray, C.M. J. Neurosci. 19, 2209–2223 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Biswal, B., Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. & Hyde, J. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537–541 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, M.D. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9673–9678 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cordes, D. et al. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21, 1636–1644 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowe, M.J., Mock, B.J. & Sorenson, J.A. Neuroimage 7, 119–132 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampson, M., Peterson, B.S., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J.C. & Gore, J.C. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 247–262 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zacks, J.M. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 651–655 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shatz, C.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 602–608 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olshausen, B.A. in The Visual Neurosciences (eds. Chalupa, L.M. & Werner, J.S.) 1603–1615 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health grant NS06833.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D Fox.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Reproduction of figure 2 from the article for each of the 14 subjects. (PDF 2423 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Regional statistics for each subject (PDF 60 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Changes in signal power, noise power, and signal/noise ratio for LMC event-related responses upon removal of RMC activity for each subject (PDF 52 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Response magnitudes binned by activity in the right somatomotor cortex. (PDF 56 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 122 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, M., Snyder, A., Zacks, J. et al. Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nat Neurosci 9, 23–25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1616

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1616

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation