Abstract
The perception of faces and of nonface objects share common early visual processing stages. Some argue, however, that the brain eventually processes faces separately from other objects, within a domain-specific module dedicated to face perception. This apparent specialization for faces could, alternatively, result from people's expertise with this category of stimuli. Here we used behavioral and electrophysiological measures of interference to address the functional independence of face and object processing. If the expert processing of faces and cars depend on common mechanisms related to holistic perception (obligatory processing of all parts), then for human subjects who are presumed to be face experts, car perception should interfere with concurrent face perception. Furthermore, such interference should increase with greater expertise in car identification, and indeed this is what we found. Event-related potentials (ERPs) suggest that this interference arose from perceptual processes contributing to the holistic processing of both objects of expertise and faces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G. & Behrmann, M. What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 555–604 (1997).
Farah, M.-J., Wilson, K.-D., Drain, M. & Tanaka, J.-N. What is “special” about face perception? Psychol. Rev. 105, 482–498 (1998).
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J. & Chun, M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17, 4302–4311 (1997).
McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J.C. & Allison, T. Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 605–610 (1997).
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M.J., Anderson, A.W., Skudlarski, P. & Gore, J.C. Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 568–573 (1999).
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J.C. & Anderson, A.W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 191–197 (2000).
Tanaka, J.W. & Curran, T. A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychol. Sci. 12, 43–47 (2001).
Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M.J. & Crommelinck, M. Expertise training with novel objects leads to left lateralized face-like electrophysiological responses. Psychol. Sci. 13, 250–257 (2002).
Gauthier, I. & Tarr, M.J. Becoming a “Greeble” expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Res. 37, 1673–1682 (1997).
Gauthier, I. & Tarr, M.J. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 431–446 (2002).
Bentin, S. et al. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 551–565 (1996).
Carmel, D. & Bentin, S. Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition 83, 1–29 (2002).
Rossion, B. et al. The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport 11, 69–74 (2000).
Epstein, R. & Kanwisher, N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392, 598–601 (1998).
Wenger, M.J. & Ingvalson, E.M. A decisional component of holistic encoding. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28, 872–892 (2002).
Lavie, N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 451–468 (1995).
de Fockert, J.W., Rees, G., Frith, C.D. & Lavie, N. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science 291, 1803–1806 (2001).
Diamond, R. & Carey, S. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115, 107–117 (1986).
Velleman, P.F. & Hoaglin, D.C. Applications, Basics and Computing of Exploratory Data Analysis (Duxbury Press, Boston, 1981).
Tucker, D.M. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 87, 154–163 (1993).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the James S. McDonnell Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (EY13441 to I.G. and MH64812 to T.C.) and the National Science Foundation (0091752 to I.G.) The authors thank M. Banich, A. Cleeremans, T. Ito, R. O'Reilly, and the members of the Perceptual Expertise Network for relevant discussions, and A. Henken, K. Moller, C. Piatt and B. Young for research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K. et al. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nat Neurosci 6, 428–432 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1029
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1029
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Faces, English words and Chinese characters: a study of dual-task interference in mono-and bilingual speakers
Experimental Brain Research (2023)
-
Individual differences and the multidimensional nature of face perception
Nature Reviews Psychology (2022)
-
Music reading experience modulates eye movement pattern in English reading but not in Chinese reading
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Wheel of Fortune: a Cross-cultural Examination of How Expertise Shapes the Mental Representations of Familiar and Unfamiliar Numerals
Computational Brain & Behavior (2022)