Skip to main content
Log in

Self-control during response conflict by human supplementary eye field

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Although medial frontal cortex is considered to have an important role in planning behavior and monitoring errors, the specific contributions of regions within it are poorly understood1,2,3. Here we report that a patient with a highly selective lesion of a medial frontal motor area—the supplementary eye field (SEF)—lacked control in changing the direction of his eye movement from either a previous intention or behavioral 'set'; however, he monitored his errors well and corrected them quickly. The results indicate a key new role for the SEF and show that medial frontal mechanisms for self-control of action may be highly specific, with the SEF critically involved in implementing oculomotor control during response conflict, but not in error monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Patient JR's lesion, cortical eye fields and intact left SMA.
Figure 2: Change-of-plan and saccadic rule-reversal paradigms.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Botvinick, M.M., Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Carter, C.S. & Cohen, J.D. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Picard, N. & Strick, P.L. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 663–672 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paus, T. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 417–424 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tehovnik, E.J., Somner, M.A., Chou, I.-H., Slocum, W.M. & Schiller, P.H. Brain Res. Rev. 32, 413–448 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schiller, P.H. & Chou, I.-H. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 248–253 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grosbras, M.H., Lobel, E., Van de Moortele, P.F., LeBihan, D. & Berthoz, A. Cereb. Cortex 9, 705–711 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Humberstone, M. et al. Ann. Neurol. 42, 632–637 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanes, D.P. & Carpenter, R.H. Vision Res. 39, 2777–2791 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Henik, A., Rafal, R. & Rhodes, D. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6, 400–411 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker, R., Walker, D.G., Husain, M. & Kennard, C. Exper. Brain Res. 130, 540–544 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Assad, W.F., Rainer, G. & Miller, E. Neuron 21, 1399–1407 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodgson, T. et al. Neuropsychologia 40, 1891–1901 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scheffers, M.K., Coles, M.G.H., Bernstein, P., Gehring, W.J. & Donchin, E. Psychophysiology 33, 42–53 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Luu, P., Flaisch, T. & Tucker, D.M. J. Neurosci. 20, 464–469 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stuphorn, V., Taylor, T.L. & Schall, J.D. Nature 408, 857–860 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to JR. We thanks S. Barash. This research was funded by The Wellcome Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masud Husain.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Husain, M., Parton, A., Hodgson, T. et al. Self-control during response conflict by human supplementary eye field. Nat Neurosci 6, 117–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1005

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation