Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the brain's assumptions

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 July 2006

This article has been updated

A Bayesian model of visual motion perception describes how the brain combines assumptions with evidence. A new study in this issue tests and expands the model, building connections between perception, the environment and neural responses.*

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: The Bayesian model of speed perception, and its predictions.

Change history

  • 09 June 2006

    text replaced

Notes

  1. *NOTE: In the version of this article originally published in print and online, the abstract contained an error. The abstract should read “A Bayesian model of visual motion perception describes how the brain combines assumptions with evidence. A new study in this issue tests and expands the model, building connections between perception, the environment and neural responses.” The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Thompson, P. Vision Res. 22, 377–380 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stone, L.S. & Thompson, P. Vision Res. 32, 1535–1549 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Snowden, R., Stimpson, N. & Ruddle, R. Nature 392, 450 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frazor, R.A. & Geisler, W.S. Vision Res. 46, 1585–1598 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stocker, A. & Simoncelli, E.P. Nature Neuroscience 9, 578–585 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E.P. & Adelson, E. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 598–604 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss Y. & Adelson, E.H. AI Memo #1624, MIT (1998).

  8. Hürlimann, F., Kiper, D. & Carandini, M. Vision Res. 42, 2253–2257 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kara, P., Reinagel, P. & Reid, R.C. Neuron 27, 635–646 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carandini, M. PLoS Biol. 2, e264 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knill, D.C. & Pouget, A. Trends Neurosci. 27, 712–719 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, J. & Newsome, W.T. J. Neurosci. 25, 711–722 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pack, C.C., Hunter, J.N. & Born, R.T. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 1809–1815 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Priebe, N.J. & Lisberger, S.G. J. Neurosci. 24, 1907–1916 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carandini, M. Measuring the brain's assumptions. Nat Neurosci 9, 468–470 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0406-468

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0406-468

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation