Skip to main content
Log in

Memory reactivation improves visual perception

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Human perception thresholds can improve through learning. Here we report findings challenging the fundamental 'practice makes perfect' basis of procedural learning theory, showing that brief reactivations of encoded visual memories are sufficient to improve perceptual discrimination thresholds. Learning was comparable to standard practice-induced learning and was not due to short training per se, nor to an epiphenomenon of primed retrieval enhancement. The results demonstrate that basic perceptual functions can be substantially improved by memory reactivation, supporting a new account of perceptual learning dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Improved discrimination thresholds following procedural memory reactivation.
Figure 2: Long-term retention.
Figure 3: Improvements not explained by primed enhanced retrieval or short training per se.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karni, A. & Sagi, D. Nature 365, 250–252 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Censor, N., Sagi, D. & Cohen, L.G. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 658–664 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou, X. & Merzenich, M.M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15935–15940 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, S.V., Choi, D.C., Davis, M. & Ressler, K.J. J. Neurosci. 28, 13106–13111 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nader, K., Schafe, G.E. & Le Doux, J.E. Nature 406, 722–726 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dudai, Y. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 227–247 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiller, D. et al. Nature 463, 49–53 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. de Beukelaar, T.T., Woolley, D.G. & Wenderoth, N. Cortex 59, 138–145 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Censor, N., Horovitz, S.G. & Cohen, L.G. Neuron 81, 69–76 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rouder, J.N., Morey, R.D., Speckman, P.L. & Province, J.M. J. Math. Psychol. 56, 356–374 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morey, R.D. & Rouder, J.N. BayesFactor 0.9. 12–2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/index.html (Comprehensive R Archive Network, 2015).

  12. Johnson, V.E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19313–19317 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, J.L. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1264–1266 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Censor, N., Karni, A. & Sagi, D. Vision Res. 46, 4071–4074 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aberg, K.C., Tartaglia, E.M. & Herzog, M.H. Vision Res. 49, 2087–2094 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussain, Z., Sekuler, A.B. & Bennett, P.J. Vision Res. 49, 2624–2634 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahissar, M. & Hochstein, S. Nature 387, 401–406 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tartaglia, E.M., Bamert, L., Mast, F.W. & Herzog, M.H. Curr. Biol. 19, 2081–2085 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Menzel, R., Manz, G., Menzel, R. & Greggers, U. Learn. Mem. 8, 198–208 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stickgold, R., James, L. & Hobson, J.A. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1237–1238 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Herszage, H. Harris, and D. Sagi for their feedback on this work and Y. Bonneh for experimental programming. The study was supported by the I-CORE program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and the ISF (grant 51/11).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.A.H., R.L.M., S.N., and N.C. designed the experiments. R.A.H., R.L.M., S.N., and N.C. collected the data. R.A.H., R.L.M., S.N., J.D.R., and N.C. analyzed the data. R.A.H., R.L.M., J.D.R., and N.C. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitzan Censor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amar-Halpert, R., Laor-Maayany, R., Nemni, S. et al. Memory reactivation improves visual perception. Nat Neurosci 20, 1325–1328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4629

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4629

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation