Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psychiatric distress in animals versus animal models of psychiatric distress

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The realm of human uniqueness steadily shrinks; reflecting this, other primates suffer from states closer to depression or anxiety than 'depressive-like' or 'anxiety-like behavior'. Nonetheless, there remain psychiatric domains unique to humans. Appreciating these continuities and discontinuities must inform the choice of neurobiological approach used in studying any animal model of psychiatric disorders. More fundamentally, the continuities reveal how aspects of psychiatric malaise run deeper than our species' history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Affective experiences on a continuum with humans; subjects are olive baboons (Papio anubis) living in the Serengeti ecosystem of East Africa.

References

  1. Shumaker, R.W., Walkup, K.R. & Beck, B.B. Animal Tool Behavior, the Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals. (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wrangham, R.W. & Glowacki, L. Hum. Nat. 23, 5–29 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brosnan, S.F. & de Waal, F.B.M. Science 346, 314–319 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steiner, A.P. & Redish, A.D. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 995–1002 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rygula, R., Pluta, H. & Popik, P. PLoS One 7, e51959 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Langford, D.J. et al. Science 312, 1967–1970 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin, L.J. et al. Curr. Biol. 25, 326–332 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Decety, J. & Mason, P. Science 334, 1427–1430 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burkett, J.P. et al. Science 351, 375–378 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Panksepp, J. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1791–1804 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Engh, A.L. et al. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 707–712 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugiyama, Y. et al. Anthropol. Sci. 117, 113–119 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fashing, P.J. et al. Am. J. Primatol. 73, 405–409 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Biro, D. et al. Curr. Biol. 20, 351–352 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodall, J. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. (Harvard University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lesch, K.P. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 251–280 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sapolsky, R.M. & Share, L.J. PLoS Biol. 2, E106–E113 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sapolsky, R. & Ray, J. Am. J. Primatol. 8, l–13 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Letham, J. Motherless Brooklyn. (Vintage, N.Y., 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skinner, B.F. Science and Human Behavior. (Simon & Schuster, NY, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M Sapolsky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sapolsky, R. Psychiatric distress in animals versus animal models of psychiatric distress. Nat Neurosci 19, 1387–1389 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4397

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4397

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation