Skip to main content
Log in

State dependence of olfactory perception as a function of taste cortical inactivation

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

As anyone who has suffered through a head cold knows, food eaten when the olfactory system is impaired tastes 'wrong', an experience that leads many to conclude that taste stimuli are processed normally only when the olfactory system is unimpaired. Evidence that the taste system influences olfactory perception, however, has been vanishingly rare. We found just such an influence; if taste cortex was inactivated when an odor was first presented, later presentations were properly appreciated only if taste cortex was again inactivated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Food preferences are socially transmitted through odor cues.
Figure 2: STFP depends on taste cortex.
Figure 3: State dependency of olfactory processing.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Desgranges, B. et al. Eur. J. Neurosci. 29, 1654–1662 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiefer, S.W. & Morrow, N.S. Behav. Neurosci. 105, 25–32 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roman, C., Nebieridze, N., Sastre, A. & Reilly, S. Behav. Neurosci. 120, 1257–1267 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balleine, B.W. & Dickinson, A. J. Neurosci. 20, 8954–8964 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jafari, M.R., Zarrindast, M.R. & Djahanguiri, B. Physiol. Behav. 88, 146–151 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz, D.B., Simon, S.A. & Nicolelis, M.A. J. Neurosci. 21, 4478–4489 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mak, Y.E., Simmons, K.B., Gitelman, D.R. & Small, D.M. Behav. Neurosci. 119, 1693–1700 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasan, K.S., Reddy, S.S. & Barsony, N. Endocr. Pract. 13, 716–720 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hummel, T. & Welge-Luessen, A. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 63, 84–98 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Small, D.M., Gerber, J.C., Mak, Y.E. & Hummel, T. Neuron 47, 593–605 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghazanfar, A.A. & Schroeder, C.E. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 278–285 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto, T., Azuma, S. & Kawamura, Y. Exp. Brain Res. 56, 23–31 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fu, W., Sugai, T., Yoshimura, H. & Onoda, N. Neuroscience 126, 1033–1041 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald, A.J. & Jackson, T.R. J. Comp. Neurol. 262, 59–77 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paxinos, G. & Watson, C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Academic Press, San Diego, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.F.-S. performed and analyzed the experiments and wrote the manuscript with D.B.K. (who guided the experiments). B.A.R. contributed data and analysis of temporarily ageusic rats and assisted C.E.P. with the electrophysiology. S.N. performed histology and imaging experiments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald B Katz.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–7, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 516 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fortis-Santiago, Y., Rodwin, B., Neseliler, S. et al. State dependence of olfactory perception as a function of taste cortical inactivation. Nat Neurosci 13, 158–159 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2463

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2463

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation