Skip to main content
Log in

Coupling endonucleases with DNA end–processing enzymes to drive gene disruption

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

From Nature Methods

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Targeted DNA double-strand breaks introduced by rare-cleaving designer endonucleases can be harnessed for gene disruption applications by engaging mutagenic nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathways. However, endonuclease-mediated DNA breaks are often subject to precise repair, which limits the efficiency of targeted genome editing. To address this issue, we coupled designer endonucleases to DNA end–processing enzymes to drive mutagenic break resolution, achieving up to 25-fold enhancements in gene disruption rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Coupling endonucleases to exonucleases increases gene disruption.
Figure 2: DNA end–processing enzymes library screen.
Figure 3: Trex2 increases knockout of endogenous CCR5 with an engineered homing endonuclease.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Urnov, F.D., Rebar, E.J., Holmes, M.C., Zhang, H.S. & Gregory, P.D. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 636–646 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lieber, M.R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 181–211 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McVey, M. & Lee, S.E. Trends Genet. 24, 529–538 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mladenov, E. & Iliakis, G. Mutat. Res. 711, 61–72 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shrivastav, M., De Haro, L.P. & Nickoloff, J.A. Cell Res. 18, 134–147 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennardo, N., Gunn, A., Cheng, A., Hasty, P. & Stark, J.M. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000683 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szymczak, A.L. & Vignali, D.A.A. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 5, 627–638 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Certo, M.T. et al. Nat. Methods 8, 671–676 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maeder, M.L., Thibodeau-Beganny, S., Sander, J.D., Voytas, D.F. & Joung, J.K. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1471–1501 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, J.C. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 143–148 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cannon, P. & June, C. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 6, 74–79 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, J. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, e149 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pattanayak, V., Ramirez, C.L., Joung, J.K. & Liu, D.R. Nat. Methods 8, 765–770 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sather, B.D. et al. Mol. Ther. 19, 515–525 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cermak, T. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e82 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.T.C. was supported in part by the US Public Health Service and National Research Service Award (T32 GM07270) from the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Additional funding was from the US National Institutes of Health (RL1CA133832, UL1DE019582, R01-HL075453, PL1-HL092557, RL1-HL092553, RL1-HL92554 and U19-AI96111) and Seattle Children's Center for Immunity and Immunotherapies. We would like to thank J. Stark (Beckman Research Institute and City of Hope) and D. Stetson (University of Washington) for initial Trex2 expression plasmids and D. Voytas (University of Minnesota) for TALEN cloning reagents. Zinc-finger nuclease expression plasmids were provided by C. Ramirez and K. Joung (Harvard University and Massachusetts General Hospital). J. Jarjour (Seattle Children's Research Institute, presently Pregenen Inc.) designed the Sce-SCID mouse, and Sce-SCID MEFs were provided by A. Astrakhan and G. Metzler (University of Washington). We thank all members of the Northwest Genome Editing Consortium for their many insightful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.T.C. designed and conceived experiments. M.T.C., K.S.G., R.K., B.S., G.C., M.B. and T.M. performed experiments. A.R.L., S.K.B., K.J., M.B., B.Y.R., H.-P.K., A.G. and F.P. provided reagents. M.T.C. wrote the paper and K.S.G., D.J.R. and A.M.S. edited the paper. D.J.R. and A.M.S provided technical support and conceptual advice.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David J Rawlings or Andrew M Scharenberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.M.S., F.P. and A.G. are employees of Cellectis and receive salary and equity compensation. A.M.S. is cofounder and board member of Pregenen Inc., a genome engineering company. A provisional patent (no. 61/447,672) for coupling endonucleases with exonucleases for gene disruption has been filed by Seattle Children's Research Institute.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–10, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 and Supplementary Note 1 (PDF 1352 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Certo, M., Gwiazda, K., Kuhar, R. et al. Coupling endonucleases with DNA end–processing enzymes to drive gene disruption. Nat Methods 9, 973–975 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2177

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation