Abstract
In studies of vision and audition, stimuli can be systematically varied by wavelength and frequency, respectively, but there is no equivalent metric for olfaction. Restricted odorant-feature metrics such as number of carbons and functional group do not account for response patterns to odorants varying along other structural dimensions. We generated a multidimensional odor metric, in which each odorant molecule was represented as a vector of 1,664 molecular descriptor values. Revisiting many studies, we found that this metric and a second optimized metric were always better at accounting for neural responses than the specific metric used in each study. These metrics were applicable across studies that differed in the animals studied, the type of olfactory neurons tested, the odorants applied and the recording methods used. We use this new metric to recommend sets of odorants that span the physicochemical space for use in olfaction experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Firestein, S. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 413, 211–218 (2001).
Kent, P.F. & Mozell, M. The recording of odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns with a voltage-sensitive dye. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 1804–1819 (1992).
Johnson, B.A., Woo, C.C. & Leon, M. Spatial coding of odorant features in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb. J. Comp. Neurol. 393, 457–471 (1998).
Zhao, H. et al. Functional expression of a mammalian odorant receptor. Science 279, 237–242 (1998).
Sato, T., Hirono, J., Tonoike, M. & Takebayashi, M. Tuning specificities to aliphatic odorants in mouse olfactory receptor neurons and their local distribution. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 2980–2989 (1994).
Rubin, B.D. & Katz, L.C. Optical imaging of odorant representations in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron 23, 499–511 (1999).
Meister, M. & Bonhoeffer, T. Tuning and topography in an odor map on the rat olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 21, 1351–1360 (2001).
Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T. & Buck, L.B. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell 96, 713–723 (1999).
Laska, M. & Teubner, P. Olfactory discrimination ability for homologous series of aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes. Chem. Senses 24, 263–270 (1999).
Johnson, B.A., Woo, C.C., Hingco, E.E., Pham, K.L. & Leon, M. Multidimensional chemotopic responses to n-aliphatic acid odorants in the rat olfactory bulb. J. Comp. Neurol. 409, 529–548 (1999).
Imamura, K., Mataga, N. & Mori, K. Coding of odor molecules by mitral/tufted cells in rabbit olfactory bulb. I. Aliphatic compounds. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 1986–2002 (1992).
Guerrieri, F., Schubert, M., Sandoz, J.C. & Giurfa, M. Perceptual and neural olfactory similarity in honeybees. PLoS Biol. 3, e60 (2005).
Araneda, R.C., Kini, A.D. & Firestein, S. The molecular receptive range of an odorant receptor. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1248–1255 (2000).
Uchida, N., Takahashi, Y.K., Tanifuji, M. & Mori, K. Odor maps in the mammalian olfactory bulb: domain organization and odorant structural features. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1035–1043 (2000).
Hallem, E.A. & Carlson, J.R. The spatial code for odors is changed by conditioning. Neuron 42, 359–361 (2004).
Hallem, E.A. & Carlson, J.R. Coding of odors by a receptor repertoire. Cell 125, 143–160 (2006).
de Bruyne, M., Foster, K. & Carlson, J.R. Odor coding in the Drosophila antenna. Neuron 30, 537–552 (2001).
de Bruyne, M., Clyne, P.J. & Carlson, J.R. Odor coding in a model olfactory organ: the Drosophila maxillary palp. J. Neurosci. 19, 4520–4532 (1999).
Wachowiak, M. & Cohen, L.B. Representation of odorants by receptor neuron input to the mouse olfactory bulb. Neuron 32, 723–735 (2001).
Sachse, S., Rappert, A. & Galizia, C.G. The spatial representation of chemical structures in the antennal lobe of honeybees: steps towards the olfactory code. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 3970–3982 (1999).
Johnson, B.A. et al. Functional mapping of the rat olfactory bulb using diverse odorants reveals modular responses to functional groups and hydrocarbon structural features. J. Comp. Neurol. 449, 180–194 (2002).
Takahashi, Y.K., Kurosaki, M., Hirono, S. & Mori, K. Topographic representation of odorant molecular features in the rat olfactory bulb. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 2413–2427 (2004).
Manzini, I., Brase, C., Chen, T. & Schild, D. Response profiles to amino acid odorants of olfactory glomeruli in larval Xenopus laevis. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 581, 567–579 (2007).
Cleland, T., Morse, A., Yue, E. & Linster, C. Behavioral models of odor similarity. Behav. Neurosci. 116, 222–231 (2002).
Laska, M., Galizia, C.G., Giurfa, M. & Menzel, R. Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure-activity relationships in honeybees. Chem. Senses 24, 429–438 (1999).
Davison, I.G. & Katz, L.C. Sparse and selective odor coding by mitral/tufted neurons in the main olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 27, 2091–2101 (2007).
Kaluza, J.F. & Breer, H. Responsiveness of olfactory neurons to distinct aliphatic aldehydes. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 927–933 (2000).
Friedrich, R.W. & Korsching, S.I. Combinatorial and chemotopic odorant coding in the zebrafish olfactory bulb visualized by optical imaging. Neuron 18, 737–752 (1997).
Tetko, I.V. et al. Virtual computational chemistry laboratory–design and description. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 19, 453–463 (2005).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Elite.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.H., R.K., D.H. and N.S. are authors of the concept. R.H. performed the analysis; R.H., N.S. and D.H. wrote the manuscript; Y.K.T. and K.M. provided data post-hoc for the blind test.
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–4, Supplementary Table 1–3, Supplementary Methods (PDF 312 kb)
Supplementary Data 1
The predicted and observed values used for the blind test. The distances were calculated by using the multidimensional optimized metric. (XLS 440 kb)
Supplementary Data 2
Interactive tool to calculate odorant distances between any two odorants out of more than 400 commonly used odorants. The distance is calculated by using the multidimensional optimized metric. (XLS 323 kb)
Supplementary Data 3
A suggested 8 clusters with different granularity of more than 400 odorants using the optimized multidimensional metric. Each clustering can be used to select odorant that span the odor space in a more systematic way. (XLS 124 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haddad, R., Khan, R., Takahashi, Y. et al. A metric for odorant comparison. Nat Methods 5, 425–429 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1197
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1197
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Predicting individual perceptual scent impression from imbalanced dataset using mass spectrum of odorant molecules
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Olfactory coding in the antennal lobe of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Data-science based analysis of perceptual spaces of odors in olfactory loss
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Structure and flexibility in cortical representations of odour space
Nature (2020)
-
Computational exploration of molecular receptive fields in the olfactory bulb reveals a glomerulus-centric chemical map
Scientific Reports (2020)