Skip to main content
Log in

The disease olympics

  • News Feature
  • Published:

From Nature Medicine

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The massive rise of patient advocacy in the US has led to an aggressive, if inadvertent, contest between disease-specific lobbyists. Advocacy groups say they're just trying to get taxpayer-backed research dollars distributed equitably according to public health need and they deny any outright competition with one another. But with research budgets shrinking, advocacy becomes a zero-sum game. Some scientists worry that pitting one disease against another threatens the leadership of government funding bodies—not to mention the basic research enterprise. Virginia Hughes reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Marshall, E. Science 276, 344–346 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Best, R.K. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77, 780–803 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gillum, L.A. et al. PLoS ONE 6, e16837 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gross, C.P., Anderson, G.F. & Powe N.R. N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 1881–1887 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sampat, B.N. Buterbaugh, K. & Perl, M. Milbank Q. 91, 163–185 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, V. The disease olympics. Nat Med 19, 257–260 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0313-257

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0313-257

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation