Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of sharing by descent, long-range phasing and haplotype imputation

  • Article
  • Published:

From Nature Genetics

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Uncertainty about the phase of strings of SNPs creates complications in genetic analysis, although methods have been developed for phasing population-based samples. However, these methods can only phase a small number of SNPs effectively and become unreliable when applied to SNPs spanning many linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks. Here we show how to phase more than 1,000 SNPs simultaneously for a large fraction of the 35,528 Icelanders genotyped by Illumina chips. Moreover, haplotypes that are identical by descent (IBD) between close and distant relatives, for example, those separated by ten meioses or more, can often be reliably detected. This method is particularly powerful in studies of the inheritance of recurrent mutations and fine-scale recombinations in large sample sets. A further extension of the method allows us to impute long haplotypes for individuals who are not genotyped.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: The concept of surrogate parenthood.
Figure 2: The relationship between sample size and the yield of LRP.
Figure 3: Applying long-range phasing to determine a recombination event.
Figure 4: The inheritance of a chromosome associated with a deletion.
Figure 5: Imputing haplotypes into an untyped proband P.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hawley, M.E. & Kidd, K.K. HAPLO: a program using the EM algorithm to estimate the frequencies of multi-site haplotypes. J. Hered. 86, 409–411 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 1162–1169 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Halperin, E. & Eskin, E. Haplotype reconstruction from genotype data using Imperfect Phylogeny. Bioinformatics 20, 1842–1849 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marchini, J. et al. A comparison of phasing algorithms for trios and unrelated individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 437–450 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheet, P. & Stephens, M. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 629–644 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goffman, C. And what is your Erdos number? Am. Math. Mon. 76, 791 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kong, A. et al. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat. Genet. 31, 241–247 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Winckler, W. et al. Comparison of fine-scale recombination rates in humans and chimpanzees. Science 308, 107–111 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Myers, S., Bottolo, L., Freeman, C., McVean, G. & Donnelly, P. A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science 310, 321–324 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeffreys, A.J. & Neumann, R. Factors influencing recombination frequency and distribution in a human meiotic crossover hotspot. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 2277–2287 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coop, G., Wen, X., Ober, C., Pritchard, J.K. & Przeworski, M. High-resolution mapping of crossovers reveals extensive variation in fine-scale recombination patterns among humans. Science 319, 1395–1398 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiss, L.A. et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 667–675 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh, T. et al. Rare structural variants disrupt multiple genes in neurodevelopmental pathways in schizophrenia. Science 320, 539–543 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stefansson, H. Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia. Nature advance online publication, doi:10.1038/nature07229 (30 July 2008).

  15. Thorlacius, S. et al. A single BRCA2 mutation in male and female breast cancer families from Iceland with varied cancer phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 13, 117–119 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gudmundsson, J. et al. Frequent occurrence of BRCA2 linkage in Icelandic breast cancer families and segregation of a common BRCA2 haplotype. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58, 749–756 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Saccone, S.F. et al. Cholinergic nicotinic receptor genes implicated in a nicotine dependence association study targeting 348 candidate genes with 3713 SNPs. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 36–49 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thorgeirsson, T.E. et al. A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature 452, 638–642 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hung, R.J. et al. A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature 452, 633–637 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amos, C.I. et al. Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nat. Genet. 40, 616–622 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Burdick, J.T., Chen, W.M., Abecasis, G.R. & Cheung, V.G. In silico method for inferring genotypes in pedigrees. Nat. Genet. 38, 1002–1004 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G. & Donnelly, P. A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes. Nat. Genet. 39, 906–913 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, J.A., Carvalho, C.M. & Lupski, J.R.A. DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell 131, 1235–1247 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.K. and K.S. planned and supervised the research. A.K. wrote the first draft of the paper and together with K.S. and G.M. did most of the writing for the final version. The idea of long range phasing (LRP) originated from A.K. and G.M., motivated by a problem posed by H.S. G.M. and P.I.O. coded the LRP algorithm. A.K., M.L.F., A.G. and P.Z. contributed to the study of the population characteristics of Iceland. A.K., G.T. and M.L.F. contributed to the recombination study. A.K., H.S., S.S. and A.I. contributed to the study of the deletion at 15q11. A.K., D.F.G., T.R., P.S. and M.L.F. contributed to the haplotype imputation study. U.T., M.M. and F.J. contributed to genotyping.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Augustine Kong or Kari Stefansson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors from deCode genetics declare competing financial interests as stock holders in deCode genetics.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Note, Supplementary Tables 1–3 (PDF 162 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kong, A., Masson, G., Frigge, M. et al. Detection of sharing by descent, long-range phasing and haplotype imputation. Nat Genet 40, 1068–1075 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.216

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation