Skip to main content
Log in

Editor says no to peer review for controversial journal

  • News
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Move demanded by publisher would 'utterly destroy' Medical Hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Horrobin, D. Med. Hypoth. 1, 1-2 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richmond, C. Br. Med. J. 326, 885 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duesberg, P. H. et al. Med. Hypoth. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.06.024 (2009).

  4. Ruggiero, M. et al. Med. Hypoth. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.06.002 (2009).

Download references

Authors

Related links

Related links

Related external links

Letter from HIV researchers to NLM

Letters in support of Charlton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cressey, D. Editor says no to peer review for controversial journal. Nature (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.132

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.132

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation