Skip to main content
Log in

Does the number of prostate biopsies performed affect the nature of the cancer identified?

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Urology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Derweesh IH et al. (2004) Continuing trends in pathological stage migration in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Oncol 22: 300–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Presti JC Jr (2003) Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough? Urol Oncol 21: 135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart CS et al. (2001) Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 166: 86–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klotz LH and Nam RK (2006) Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention for favorable risk prostate cancer: clinical experience and a 'number needed to treat' analysis. Can J Urol 13 (Suppl 1): S48–S55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Tamsin Osborne, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porter, C. Does the number of prostate biopsies performed affect the nature of the cancer identified?. Nat Rev Urol 4, 132–133 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0712

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0712

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation