Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intermittent androgen blockade should be regarded as standard therapy in prostate cancer

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

An Article Report to this article was published on 01 February 2009

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson CA et al. (2003) Andropause: symptom management for prostate cancer patients treated with hormonal ablation. Oncologist 8: 474–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Braga-Basaria M et al. (2006) Metabolic syndrome in men with prostate cancer undergoing long-term androgen-deprivation therapy. J Clin Oncol 24: 3979–3983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Keating NL et al. (2006) Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 4448–4456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sato N et al. (1996) Intermittent androgen suppression delays progression to androgen-independent regulation of prostate-specific antigen gene in the LNCaP prostate tumor model. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 58: 139–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Akakura E et al. (1993) Effects of intermittent androgen suppression on androgen-dependent tumors: apoptosis and prostate-specific antigen. Cancer 71: 2782–2790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Leval J et al. (2002) Intermittent versus continuous total androgen blockade in the treatment of patients with advanced hormone-naïve prostate cancer: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Clin Prostate Cancer 1: 163–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tunn UW (online 2007) Intermittent androgen deprivation in patients with PSA-relapse after radical prostatectomy-final results of a European randomized prospective phase-III clinical trial AUO study AP 06/95, EC 507 [http://www.abstracts2view.com/aua_archive/view.php?nu=200791183] (accessed 17 June 2008)

  8. Miller K et al. (2007) Randomized prospective study of intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression in advanced prostate cancer [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18S): 5015

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calais da Silva FM et al. (2006) Phase III study of intermittent MAB versus continuous MAB [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18S): 4513

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prostate Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (2000) Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 335: 1491–1498

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian F Tannock.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Randomized clinical trials comparing intermittent and continuous androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer. (DOC 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seruga, B., Tannock, I. Intermittent androgen blockade should be regarded as standard therapy in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 5, 574–576 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1180

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1180

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation