Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for ventral hernia repair—which is best?

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Stoppa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13: 545–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luijendijk RW et al. (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343: 392–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heniford BT et al. (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years' experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238: 391–400

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Park A et al. (1998) Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a comparison study. Surgery 124: 816–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carbajo MA et al. (1999) Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh. Surg Endosc 13: 250–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Rachel Jones, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B Todd Heniford.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have received research grants from the following companies: Ethicon, Inc; W.L. Gore & Associates; Ethicon Endosurgery; Stryker Endoscopy; Cook Biotech; and Karl Storz of America.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zerey, M., Heniford, B. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for ventral hernia repair—which is best?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 372–373 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0548

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0548

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation