Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can familial combined hyperlipidemia diagnostic criteria be improved by the use of a nomogram?

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

From Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine

View current issue Sign up to alerts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hopkins PN et al. (2003) Coronary artery disease risk in familial combined hyperlipidemia and familial hypertriglyceridemia: a case-control comparison from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Circulation 108: 519–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hense HW et al. (2003) Framingham risk function overestimates risk of coronary heart disease in men and women from Germany—results from the MONICA Augsburg and the PROCAM cohorts. Eur Heart J 24: 937–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Assman G et al. (2002) Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) Study. Circulation 105: 310–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Hannah Camm, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randal J Thomas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, R. Can familial combined hyperlipidemia diagnostic criteria be improved by the use of a nomogram?. Nat Rev Cardiol 1, 78–79 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0037

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0037

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation