Increasing demand for solution-oriented environmental assessments brings significant opportunities and challenges at the science–policy–society interface. Solution-oriented assessments should enable inclusive deliberative learning processes about policy alternatives and their practical consequences.
References
Jabbour, J. & Flachsland, C. Environ. Sci. Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.001 (2017).
Mitchell, R. B., Clark, W. C., Cash, D. W. & Dickson, N. M. (eds) Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence (MIT Press, 2006).
Kowarsch, M. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 15–17 (2016).
Norgaard, R. B. Conserv. Biol. 22, 862–869 (2008).
Kowarsch, M. et al. Palgrave Comm. 2, 16092 (2016).
Dodds, F., Laguna-Celis, J. & Thompson, L. From Rio+20 to a New Development Agenda: Building a bridge to a sustainable future (Routledge, 2014).
Perrings, C., Duraiappah, A., Larigauderie, A. & Mooney, H. Science 331, 1139–1140 (2011).
The Future of Sustainable Development: Rethinking Sustainable Development After Rio+20 and Implications for UNEP (IISD, 2013).
Carraro, C. et al. Science 350, 34–35 (2015).
Lee, H. Science 350, 1007 (2015).
Victor, D. G. Nature 520, 27–29 (2015).
Edenhofer, O. & Kowarsch, M. Environ. Sci. Policy 51, 56–64 (2015).
von Stechow, C. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 034022 (2016).
Garard, J. & Kowarsch, M. Environ. Sci. Policy http://doi.org/b6rt (2017).
Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. Futures 25, 739–755 (1993).
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Polity Press, 2001).
Fabricius, C., Scholes, R. & Cundill, G. in Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment (eds Reid, W. V., Wilbanks, T., Capistrano, D. & Berkes, F.) 165–182 (World Resources Institute, 2006).
Edenhofer, O. & Minx, J. Science 345, 37–38 (2014).
Riousset, P., Flachsland, C. & Kowarsch, M. Environ. Sci. Policy http://doi.org/b6rs (2017).
Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).
Petersen, A., Blackstock, J. & Morisetti, N. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 909–911 (2015).
Dietz, T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14081–14087 (2013).
Haas, P. M. Epistemic Communities, Constructivism and International Environmental Politics (Routledge, 2015).
Grieneseisen, M. L. & Zhang, M. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 72–73 (2011).
Acknowledgements
The insights presented here are based on a larger research project Future of Global Environmental Assessment Making (2013–2016) jointly initiated by the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change and UN Environment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 573 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kowarsch, M., Jabbour, J., Flachsland, C. et al. A road map for global environmental assessments. Nature Clim Change 7, 379–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3307
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3307
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
An evolution towards scientific consensus for a sustainable ocean future
npj Ocean Sustainability (2022)
-
Grounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectives
Sustainability Science (2021)
-
A topography of climate change research
Nature Climate Change (2020)
-
Nitrogen immobilization may reduce invasibility of nutrient enriched plant community invaded by Phragmites australis
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Reflections on cross-impact balances, a systematic method constructing global socio-technical scenarios for climate change research
Climatic Change (2020)