In the emerging post-Paris climate governance regime, the role of scientific expertise is radically changing. The IPCC in particular may find itself in a new role, where projections of future climate function as a kind of regulatory science. This poses great challenges to conventional ideals of scientific neutrality.
References
Tollefson, J. Naturehttp://doi.org/b4r8 (2015).
Lövbrand, E. Sci. Public Pol. 38, 225–236 (2011).
Rayner, S. Anthropol. Today 32, 1–2 (2016).
Lord Stern: we need negative emissions to avoid 2C warming. Climate Home (28 October 2016).
Anderson, K. & Peters, G. Science 354, 182–183 (2016).
Geden, O. WIREs Clim. Change 7, 790–797 (2016).
Anderson, K. & Peters, G. Science 354, 182–183 (2016).
Buck, H. J. Climatic Change 139, 155–167 (2016).
Caught in the Net: How “Net-Zero Emissions” will Delay Real Climate Action and Drive Land Grabs. (ActionAid, 2015).
Guston, D. & Stilgoe, J. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 4th edn, 853–880 (2016).
Barben, D. et al. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 3rd edn, 979–1000 (2008).
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. Res. Policy 42, 1568–1580 (2013).
Parker, A. & Geden, O. Nat. Geosci. 9, 859–860 (2016).
Hackmann, H., Moser, S. C. & St. Clair, A. L. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 653–655 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the German DFG in the context of the Priority Program Climate Engineering: Risks, Challenges, Opportunities? (SPP 1689), and by the University of Nottingham International Collaboration Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beck, S., Mahony, M. The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nature Clim Change 7, 311–313 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3264
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3264
- Springer Nature Limited