Moral concerns as to the relationship of synthetic biology with nature do not provide a convincing basis for more stringent regulatory oversight of the field.
References
Boldt, J. & Müller, O. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 387–389 (2008).
Preston, C.J. Environ. Values 17, 23–39 (2008).
Cho, M.K., Magnus, D., Caplan, A.L., McGee, D. & the Ethics of Genomics Group. Science 286, 2087–2090 (1999).
Charles, Prince of Wales. Questions about genetically modified organisms. Daily Mail 1 June 1999.
<http://etcgroup.org/upload/publication/707/01/etc_won_report_final_color.pdf>.
<http://etcgroup.org/upload/publication/602/01/synbioreportweb.pdf>.
Brent, R. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1211–1214 (2004).
Royal Academy of Engineering. Synthetic Biology: Public Dialogue on Synthetic Biology (Royal Academy of Engineering, London, 2009).
Kaebnick, G.E. Perspect. Biol. Med. 50, 572–584 (2007).
Streiffer, R. & Rubel, A. Public Aff. Q. 18, 223–248 (2004).
Pollan, M. The Botany of Desire: A Plant's Eye View of the World (Random House, New York, 2001).
<http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/11/synthetic-biology/>.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by grants from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and from the US National Endowment for the Humanities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaebnick, G. Should moral objections to synthetic biology affect public policy?. Nat Biotechnol 27, 1106–1108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1209-1106
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1209-1106
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Playing God and tampering with nature: popular labels for real concerns in synthetic biology
Transgenic Research (2021)
-
Ethical Perspectives on Synthetic Biology
Biological Theory (2013)