Skip to main content
Log in

Biofortified sorghum in Africa: using problem formulation to inform risk assessment

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Jennings, P.R. & Cock, J.H. Econ. Bot. 31, 51–54 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, J. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 27–33 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cross, F.B. Wash. Lee Law Rev. 53, 851–925 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paarlberg, R. Starved for Science: How Biotechnology is Being Kept Out of Africa (Harvard University Press, Boston, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandler, S. & Dunwell, J. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 27, 25–49 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, K.L., Raybould, A., Hudson, M.D. & Poppy, G. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 1–5 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nickson, T. Plant Physiol. 147, 494–502 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raybould, A. & Cooper, I. Environ. Biosaftey Res 4, 127–140 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raybould, A. Environ. Biosafety Res. 5, 119–125 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raybould, A. Plant Sci. 173, 589–602 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Romeis, J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 203–208 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolt, J. et al. Transgenic Res. 19, 425–436 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kimber, C.T. in Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, and Production (eds. Smith, C.W. & Frederiksen, R.A.) 3–98 (Wiley, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tesso, T. et al. Crop Sci. 48, 1425–1431 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mutegi, E. et al. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 57, 243–253 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Craig, W., Tepfer, M., Degrassi, G. & Ripendelli, D. Euphytica 164, 853–880 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellstrand, N.C. Dangerous Liaisons? When Cultivated Plants Mate with their Wild Relatives (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lubchenco, J. Science 279, 491–497 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McMillian, W.W., Wiseman, B.R., Burns, R.E., Harris, H.B. & Greene, G.L. J. Agron. 64, 821–822 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gepts, P. & Papa, R. Environ. Biosafety Res. 2, 89–103 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chandrashekar, A. & Satyanarayana, K.V. J. Cereal Sci. 44, 287–304 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Program for Biosafety Systems, Africa Harvest, and the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center for financial and logistical support to bring together the individuals whose discussion led to this paper, and J. Pedersen and S. deVilliers for their significant contributions during the discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen E Hokanson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hokanson, K., Ellstrand, N., Ouedraogo, J. et al. Biofortified sorghum in Africa: using problem formulation to inform risk assessment. Nat Biotechnol 28, 900–903 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0910-900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0910-900

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation