Skip to main content
Log in

When blind is better: Protein design by evolution

  • Analysis
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Dawkins, R. 1986. The blind watchmaker. Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dennett, D. C. 1995. Darwin's dangerous ideal. Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buchholz, F. Anagrand, P.-O., and Stewart, A. F. 1998. Nature Biotechnology. 16: 657–662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumamaru, T. et al. 1998. Nature Biotechnolgy 16: 663–656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tawfik, D.S. and Griffiths, A.D. 1998. Nature Biotechnology 16: 652–656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahiyat, B.I. and Mayo, S.L. 1997. Science 278: 82–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujii, I. et al. 1998 Nature Biotechnology 16: 463–472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crameri, A., Raillard, S.-A., Stemmer, W.P.C. 1998. Nature 391: 288–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnold, F. When blind is better: Protein design by evolution. Nat Biotechnol 16, 617–618 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0798-617

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0798-617

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation