Recommendations on how best to exploit the strengths of peptide-centric proteomics and avoid its pitfalls.
References
Nedelkov, D. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10852–10857 (2005).
Krishna, R.G. & Wold, F. Adv. Enzymol. 67, 265–298 (1993).
Brunner, E. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 576–583 (2007).
Picotti, P., Aebersold, R. & Domon, B. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1589–1598 (2007).
Carr, S. et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 531–533 (2004).
Andersen, J.S. & Mann, M. EMBO Rep. 7, 874–879 (2006).
Wilkins, M.R. et al. Proteomics 6, 4–8 (2006).
Shen, Y. et al. Anal. Chem. 80, 1871–1882 (2008).
Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392 (2002).
Elias, J.E. & Gygi, S.P. Nat. Methods 4, 207–214 (2007).
Nesvizhskii, A.I. & Aebersold, R. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1419–1440 (2005).
Whaley, B. & Caprioli, R.M. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 20, 210–214 (1991).
Chamrad, D. & Meyer, H.E. Nat. Methods 2, 647–648 (2005).
Elias, J.E., Haas, W., Faherty, B.K. & Gygi, S.P. Nat. Methods 2, 667–675 (2005).
Schmidt, A., Claassen, M. & Aebersold, R. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 510–517 (2009).
Hackett, M. Proteomics 8, 4618–4623 (2008).
Duncan, M.W., Yergey, A.L. & Patterson, S.D. Proteomics 9, 1124–1127 (2009).
Schulze, W.X. & Usadel, B. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 491–516 (2010).
Liu, H., Sadygov, R.G. & Yates, J.R., III. Anal. Chem. 76, 4193–4201 (2004).
Braisted, J.C. et al. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 529 (2008).
Chelius, D. & Bondarenko, P.V. J. Proteome Res. 1, 317–323 (2002).
Bondarenko, P.V., Chelius, D. & Shaler, T.A. Anal. Chem. 74, 4741–4749 (2002).
Settlage, R.E. et al. PRG-2009: Relative Protein Quantification in a Clinical Matrix (ABRF, Proteomics Research Group, 2009) <http://www.abrf.org/ResearchGroups/Proteomics/EPosters/PRG2009_poster.pdf>.
Picotti, P. et al. Nat. Methods 7, 43–46 (2010).
Picotti, P. et al. Nat. Methods 5, 913–914 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We thank R. Nelson, A. Yergey and I. Krull for their insightful and constructive comments on early drafts of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duncan, M., Aebersold, R. & Caprioli, R. The pros and cons of peptide-centric proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 28, 659–664 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0710-659
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0710-659
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Evaluation of linear models and missing value imputation for the analysis of peptide-centric proteomics
BMC Bioinformatics (2019)
-
Multiple Reaction Monitoring for Direct Quantitation of Intact Proteins Using a Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (2016)
-
A novel antibody–drug conjugate targeting SAIL for the treatment of hematologic malignancies
Blood Cancer Journal (2015)