Skip to main content
Log in

Patently absurd?

  • News Feature
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Ariad Pharmaceuticals's victory against Lilly on NF-κB patent infringement has drug companies and legal experts wondering about the future of biotech patenting. Ken Garber reports on the aftermath of the surprising decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Epinat, J.C. & Gilmore, T.D. Oncogene 18, 6896–6909 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Begley, S. & Johannes, L. Wall Street Journal, June 26, 2002, p. B1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garber, K. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 127–130 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pande, V. & Ramos, M.J. Curr. Med. Chem. 12, 357–374 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Loop, T. & Pahl, H. In Nuclear Factor κB (ed., Beyaert, R.) 1–48 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

https://doi.org/10.1038/Nat.Biotechnol24,127–130,(2006)

https://doi.org/10.1038/News@Nature24,249-251

https://doi.org/10.1038/News@Nature4,8-8(01Jan2005)

Web links

Ariad Pharmaceuticals

Eli Lilly

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garber, K. Patently absurd?. Nat Biotechnol 24, 737–739 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0706-737

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0706-737

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation