Skip to main content
Log in

Making 'safety first' a reality for biotechnology products

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Johnson, B. & Dallimore, R. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 871 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Editor. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 527 (2002).

  3. Shubert, D. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 969 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Snow, A.A. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 542 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smyth, S., Khachatourians, G.G., & Phillips, P.W.B. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 537–541 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapuscinski, A.R., Jacobs, L.R. & Pullins, E.E. (eds.). Safety first: making it a reality for biotechnology products: final report of the April 22, 2002 workshop (Institute for Social, Economic and Ecological Sustainability, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 2002). http://www.fw.umn.edu/isees/biotech/sfreport.pdf

  7. Scientists' Working Group on Biosafety. Manual for Assessing Ecological and Human Health Effects of Genetically Engineered Organisms (Edmonds Inst., Edmonds, WA, 1998).

  8. Letourneau, D.K. & Burrows, B.E. (eds.). Genetically Engineered Organisms: Assessing Environmental and Human Health Effects (CRC Press, New York, NY, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. USDA ABRAC Working Group on Aquatic Biotechnology and Environmental Safety. Performance standards for safely conducting research with genetically modified fish and shellfish (USDA Office of Agricultural Biotechnology document no. 95–2004, 95–2005, USDA, Washington, DC, 1995).

  10. Committee on Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants. Genetically modified pest-protected plants: science and regulation (National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2000).

  11. Committee on Environmental Impacts Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants. Environmental effects of transgenic plants: the scope and adequacy of regulation (National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002).

  12. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the convention on biological diversity (Articles 15, 16 and Annex III) (UNEP, Montreal, ON, 2000).

  13. Committee on Defining Science-Based Concerns Associated With Products of Animal Biotechnology. Animal biotechnology: science-based concerns (National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002).

  14. Aldrich, M. Safety First: Technology, Labor and Business in the Building of American Worker Safety 1870–1939 (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruttan, V.W. Technology, Growth and Development (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stern, P.C. & Fineberg, H.V. (eds.). Understanding Risk (National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gibbons, M. Nature, 402, C81–C84 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davison, J. Environ. Biosafety Res. 1, 9–18 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, the Pew Fellows Program on Marine Conservation and numerous colleges and programs at the University of Minnesota.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kapuscinski, A., Goodman, R., Hann, S. et al. Making 'safety first' a reality for biotechnology products. Nat Biotechnol 21, 599–601 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0603-599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0603-599

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation