References
Ma, H. et al. Nature 548, 413–419 (2017).
National Academy of Sciences. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2017).
International Society for Stem Cell Research. Guidelines for Stem Cell Science and Clinical Translation http://www.isscr.org/guidelines2016 (ISSCR, 2016).
Scheufele, D.A. et al. Science 357, 553–554 (2017).
Raspberry, K.A. & Skinner, D. Soc. Sci. Med. 72, 992–998 (2011).
Greil, A., McQuillan, J. & Slauson-Blevins, K. Sociol. Compass 5, 736–746 (2011).
Cyranoski, D. Nature 548, 272–274 (2017).
Harris, L.H. & Wolfe, T. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 26, 539–544 (2014).
Roberts, D. Dissent 62, 79–82 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hyun, I., Osborn, C. Query the merits of embryo editing for reproductive research now. Nat Biotechnol 35, 1023–1025 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4000
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4000
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Human germline genome editing is illegal in Canada, but could it be desirable for some members of the rare disease community?
Journal of Community Genetics (2020)