Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Better beings?

  • News Feature
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

As the technology to create genetically modified babies moves closer to practice, what questions should we ask before such procedures are contemplated? Amber Dance investigates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1: A patchwork of laws and regulations for germline modification.

© iStockphoto

Figure 2: Acceptance of genome engineering.

References

  1. Ma, H. et al. Nature 548, 413–419 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Geurts, A.M. et al. Science 325, 433 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyce, N. Nature 414, 677 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liang, P. et al. Protein Cell 6, 363–372 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang, X. et al. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 33, 581–588 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang, L. et al. Mol. Genet. Genomics 292, 525–533 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fogarty, N.M.E., et al. Nature 550, 67–73 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Egli, D. et al. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/08/28/181255 (2017).

  9. Scott, D.A. & Zhang, F. Nat. Med. 23, 1095–1101 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lek, M. et al. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).

  12. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. International Summit on Human Gene Editing: A Global Discussion (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2015).

  13. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2017).

  14. Ormond, K.E., et al. Amer. J. Human Genet. 101, 167–176 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lanphier, E., et al. Nature 519, 410–411 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Egan, J.F.X. et al. Prenat. Diagn. 31, 389–394 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Graaf, G. et al. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38402 (2017).

  18. Albrecht, G.L. & Devlieger, P.J. Soc. Sci. Med. 48, 977–88 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheufele, D.A., et al. Science 357, 553–554 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cyranoski, D. Nature 548, 272–274 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishii, T., Brief Funct. Genomics 16, 46–56 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Konig, H., Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 502–506 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lander, E.S. N. Eng. J. Med. 373, 5–8 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jonsson, T. Nature 488, 96–99 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mercader, J.M. et al. Diabetes https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db17-0187 (2017).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Los Angeles

    Amber Dance

Authors
  1. Amber Dance
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dance, A. Better beings?. Nat Biotechnol 35, 1006–1011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3998

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3998

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation