Skip to main content
Log in

The ecological landscape of microbiome science

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Two reports examine the sources of variation in methods for analyzing microbial communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Debbie Maizels/Springer Nature

References

  1. Cho, I. & Blaser, M.J. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 260–270 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alivisatos, A.P. et al. Science 350, 507–508 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Costea, P.I. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3960 (2017).

  4. Sinha, R. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3981 (2017).

  5. Goodrich, J.K. et al. Cell 158, 250–262 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gohl, D.M. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 942–949 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, M.B. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14024–14029 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salter, S.J. et al. BMC Biol. 12, 87 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daryl M Gohl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.M.G. is a shareholder and CSO of CoreBiome, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gohl, D. The ecological landscape of microbiome science. Nat Biotechnol 35, 1047–1049 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3983

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3983

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation