Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid quantum logic and a test of Bell’s inequality using two different atomic isotopes

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Entanglement is one of the most fundamental properties of quantum mechanics1,2,3, and is the key resource for quantum information processing4,5 (QIP). Bipartite entangled states of identical particles have been generated and studied in several experiments, and post-selected or heralded entangled states involving pairs of photons, single photons and single atoms, or different nuclei in the solid state, have also been produced6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Here we use a deterministic quantum logic gate to generate a ‘hybrid’ entangled state of two trapped-ion qubits held in different isotopes of calcium, perform full tomography of the state produced, and make a test of Bell’s inequality with non-identical atoms. We use a laser-driven two-qubit gate13, whose mechanism is insensitive to the qubits’ energy splittings, to produce a maximally entangled state of one 40Ca+ qubit and one 43Ca+ qubit, held 3.5 micrometres apart in the same ion trap, with 99.8 ± 0.6 per cent fidelity. We test the CHSH (Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt)14 version of Bell’s inequality for this novel entangled state and find that it is violated by 15 standard deviations; in this test, we close the detection loophole8 but not the locality loophole7. Mixed-species quantum logic is a powerful technique for the construction of a quantum computer based on trapped ions, as it allows protection of memory qubits while other qubits undergo logic operations or are used as photonic interfaces to other processing units15,16. The entangling gate mechanism used here can also be applied to qubits stored in different atomic elements; this would allow both memory and logic gate errors caused by photon scattering to be reduced below the levels required for fault-tolerant quantum error correction, which is an essential prerequisite for general-purpose quantum computing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Calcium ion energy levels and experimental geometry.
Figure 2: Entangling gate sequence and results.
Figure 3: Density matrix of the mixed-isotope Bell state.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schrödinger, E. Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, J. S. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Deutsch, D. Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97–117 (1985)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661–663 (1991)

    Article  CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman, S. J. & Clauser, J. F. Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938–941 (1972)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowe, M. A. et al. Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409, 791–794 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moehring, D. L., Madsen, M., Blinov, B. & Monroe, C. Experimental Bell inequality violation with an atom and a photon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 090410 (2004)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Giustina, M. et al. Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption. Nature 497, 227–230 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen, B. G. et al. Detection-loophole-free test of quantum nonlocality, and applications. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 130406 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfaff, W. et al. Demonstration of entanglement-by-measurement of solid-state qubits. Nature Phys. 9, 29–33 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leibfried, D. et al. Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate. Nature 422, 412–415 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wineland, D. J. et al. Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions. J. Res. Natl Inst. Stand. Technol. 103, 259–328 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Monroe, C. & Kim, J. Scaling the ion trap quantum processor. Science 339, 1164–1169 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Moehring, D. L., Olmschenk, S. & Monroe, C. Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 150404 (2008)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lanyon, B. P. et al. Experimental violation of multipartite Bell inequalities with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 100403 (2014)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blatt, R. & Wineland, D. J. Entangled states of trapped atomic ions. Nature 453, 1008–1015 (2008)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harty, T. P. et al. High-fidelity preparation, gates, memory, and readout of a trapped-ion quantum bit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 220501 (2014)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ballance, C. J., Harty, T. P., Linke, N. M. & Lucas, D. M. High-fidelity two-qubit quantum logic gates using trapped calcium-43 ions. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1406.5473 (2014)

  22. Barrett, M. D. et al. Sympathetic cooling of 9Be+ and 24Mg+ for quantum logic. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042302 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Home, J. P. et al. Complete methods set for scalable ion trap quantum information processing. Science 325, 1227–1230 (2009)

    Article  CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Langer, C. et al. Long-lived qubit memory using atomic ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 060502 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt, P. O. et al. Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science 309, 749–752 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hume, D. B., Rosenband, T. & Wineland, D. J. High-fidelity adaptive qubit detection through repetitive quantum nondemolition measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 120502 (2007)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ballance, C. J. High-Fidelity Quantum Logic in Ca+. D.Phil. thesis, Univ. Oxford (2014)

  28. Home, J. P. et al. Memory coherence of a sympathetically cooled trapped-ion qubit. Phys. Rev. A 79, 050305 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M. & Cleland, A. N. Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan, T. R. et al. Multi-element logic gates for trapped-ion qubits. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature16186 (this issue)

  31. Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. McDonnell, M. J. et al. High-efficiency detection of a single quantum of angular momentum by suppression of optical pumping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 153601 (2004)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Myerson, A. H. et al. High-fidelity readout of trapped-ion qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 200502 (2008)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the UK EPSRC ‘Networked Quantum Information Technology’ Hub and the US Army Research Office (contract W911NF-14-1-0217). D.M.L. thanks A. Castillo and E. A. Castillo for their hospitality while revising the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the development of the apparatus and/or the design of the experiments. J.P.H. and D.M.L. conceived the experiments and took preliminary data. C.J.B. and V.M.S. designed and performed the experiments described here, analysed data and produced the figures. C.J.B. and D.M.L. wrote the manuscript, which all authors discussed.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. Ballance.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ballance, C., Schäfer, V., Home, J. et al. Hybrid quantum logic and a test of Bell’s inequality using two different atomic isotopes. Nature 528, 384–386 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16184

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16184

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation