Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: IACUC needs more information

  • Protocol Review
  • Published:
Lab Animal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Animal Welfare Act (7 USC, 2143(a)(3)(C)).

  2. Public Health Service. Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals IV.C.1.b (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986; reprinted 2002).

  3. Animal Welfare Act (7 USC, 2143(a)(3)(B)).

  4. 9 CFR, 2.31(d)(1)(ix).

  5. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 60–64 (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996).

  6. Beaver, B.V. et al. 2000 Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 218(5), 669–696 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pohl is IACUC Coordinator, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT.,

    Alison D. Pohl

Authors
  1. Alison D. Pohl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pohl, A. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: IACUC needs more information. Lab Anim 35, 15–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1006-15b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1006-15b

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Search

Navigation