Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: USDA pain categories do not apply

  • Protocol Review
  • Published:
Lab Animal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Animal Welfare Act as Amended (7 USC 2131–2159).

  2. Public Health Service. Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986; reprinted 2002).

  3. USDA APHIS AC. Animal Care Policy #11: Painful Procedures. (14 April 1997).

  4. USDA APHIS AC. Animal Care Policy #12: Written Narrative for Alternatives to Painful Procedures (21 June 2000).

  5. Huerkamp, M.J. & Archer, D.R. in The IACUC Handbook (eds. Silverman, J., Suckow,M. & Murthy, S.) Ch. 14 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ryden is Director of the Research Animal Facility and the Attending Veterinarian and Conway is Supervisor of the Veterinary Technicians, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ.,

    Eva B. Ryden &  Kelly M. Conway

Authors
  1. Eva B. Ryden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelly M. Conway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryden, E., Conway, K. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: USDA pain categories do not apply. Lab Anim 34, 19–20 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1005-19b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1005-19b

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Search

Navigation