Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No relevant difference

  • Protocol Review
  • Published:
Lab Animal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arluke, A. & Sanders, C.R. Regarding Animals (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roughan, J.V. & Flecknell, P.A. Training in behaviour-based post-operative pain scoring in rats—An evaluation based on improved recognition of analgesic requirements. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 96, 327–348 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Olsson is at IBMC-Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Portugal ,

    Anna S. Olsson

  2. Sørensen and Sandøe are in the Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,

    Dorte B. Sørensen &  Peter Sandøe

Authors
  1. Anna S. Olsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dorte B. Sørensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Sandøe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsson, A., Sørensen, D. & Sandøe, P. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No relevant difference. Lab Anim 38, 256–257 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0809-256b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0809-256b

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Search

Navigation