Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Is 'duplicative' really duplication?

  • Protocol Review
  • Published:
Lab Animal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Animal Welfare Act Regulations. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 9, Chapter 1.

  2. Mandrell, T.D. Alternatives and the Animal Welfare Act. AWIC Newsletter 2 (1991). http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v2n1.htm

  3. Morgan, D. Avoiding duplication of research involving animals. Occasional Paper No 7. (New Zealand National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee, 2011). http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/regs/animal-welfare/pubs/naeac/occasional-paper-7.pdf

  4. Public Health Service. Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986; amended 2002).

  5. ARENA/OLAW. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidebook 2nd edn. (OLAW, Bethesda, MD, 2002).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, J., Brown, G. & Hickman, D. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Is 'duplicative' really duplication?. Lab Anim 42, 81–82 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.231

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.231

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation