Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Four wishes for Aubrey

  • Special Feature
  • Published:
Journal of Perinatology Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the critical care environment, what begins as cure-oriented and life-extending treatment may become unsuccessful in overcoming the patient's increasingly complex pathophysiology. A case from the neonatal intensive care unit is presented and used to elaborate upon care transitions toward palliative and supportive care that can be rendered in the hospital, at home or in a hospice facility. Successful transitions may rest upon anticipatory guidance by the primary physician and team, or a consultant, to facilitate and enable parents and team members alike in addressing the hard realities that cure, or even successful ICU discharge, is unlikely. A simple mechanism of addressing and accommodating a family's wishes is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Abbreviations

NICU:

neonatal intensive care unit

VSD:

ventricular septal defect

References

  1. Biard JM, Wilson RD, Johnson MP, Hedrick HL, Schwarz U, Flake AW et al. Prenatally diagnosed giant omphaloceles: short- and long-term outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 434–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Now I Lay Me Down To Sleep. Accessed on-line 12 October 2010 at URL http://www.nowilaymedowntosleep.org/.

  3. Meert KL, Eggly S, Pollack M, Anand KJ, Zimmerman J, Carcillo J et al. Parents' perspectives on physician-parent communication near the time of a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008; 9: 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meert KL, Briller SH, Schim SM, Thurston CS . Exploring parents' environmental needs at the time of a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008; 9: 623–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meert KL, Briller SH, Schim SM, Thurston C, Kabel A . Examining the needs of bereaved parents in the pediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative study. Death Studies 2009; 33: 712–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miceli P, Clark P . Your patient—my child. Seven priorities for improving pediatric care from the parent's perspective. J Nurs Quality 2005; 20: 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer EC, Burns JB, Griffith JL, Truog RD . Parental perspectives on end-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 226–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer EC, Ritholz MD, Burns JB, Truog RD . Improving the quality of end-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit: priorities and recommendations. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 649–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Truog RD, Meyer EC, Burns JD . Toward interventions to improve end-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: S373–S379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yee W, Ross S . Communicating with parents of high risk infants in neonatal intensive care. Pediatr Child Health 2006; 11: 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fox S, Platt FW, White MK, Hulac P . Talking about the unthinkable: perinatal/neonatal communication issues and procedures. Clin Perinatol 2005; 32: 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao JK, Anderson LA, Inui TS, Frankel RM . Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients. Med Care 2007; 45: 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyer EC, Tunick RA . Family adjustment and support. In: Walsh D (ed.) Palliative Medicine. Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, 2008 pp 1093–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gillis J, Rennick J . Affirming love in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006; 7 (2): 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Browning DM, Meyer EC, Truog RD, Solomon MZ . Difficult conversations in health care: cultivating relational learning to address the hidden curriculum. Acad Med 2007; 82: 905–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B S Carter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, B., Brown, J., Brown, S. et al. Four wishes for Aubrey. J Perinatol 32, 10–14 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.171

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.171

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Keywords

This article is cited by

Navigation